In This Section |
This section contains the following topics:
|
1. Description of PL 106-475, Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, and its Impact on 38 U.S.C. 5102, 5103, and 5103A
Introduction |
This topic contains information about PL 106-475 and its impact on 38 U.S.C. 5102, 5103, and 5103A, including
|
Change Date |
June 29, 2015 |
I.i.1.A.1.a. Description of PL 106-475 |
Public Law (PL) 106-475, Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, was enacted on November 9, 2000, and
The impact on VA’s duty to notify and duty to assist claimants is discussed in this chapter.
References: For more information on VA’s
|
I.i.1.A.1.b. Amendment to 38 U.S.C. 5102 |
PL 106-475 amended 38 U.S.C. 5102 to require VA, upon a receipt of an incomplete application for benefits or an intent to claim or apply for a benefit, to
Note: This includes furnishing the applicant any instructions and forms necessary to apply for that benefit.
References: For more information on
|
I.i.1.A.1.c. Amendment to 38 U.S.C. 5103 |
PL 106-475 amended 38 U.S.C. 5103 to require VA to notify the claimant of any information not previously provided that is necessary to substantiate the claim. The PL provided that such information shall be received by VA within one year from the date of the notification.
Note: VA has traditionally referred to the required notice in 38 U.S.C. 5103 as a VCAA Notice. However, because of amendments to the law since the Veterans Claims Assistance Act (VCAA) of 2000, the term Section 5103 notice has now replaced VCAA Notice and such term will be used throughout the manual.
Reference: For more information on VA’s duty to notify under 38 U.S.C. 5103, see
|
I.i.1.A.1.d. Amendment to 38 U.S.C. 5103A |
PL 106-475 amended 38 U.S.C. 5103A to require VA to make reasonable efforts to assist a claimant in obtaining evidence necessary to substantiate a claim. This assistance includes obtaining relevant Federal records, relevant private records adequately identified by the claimant, and a medical examination, if necessary to decide the claim.
Reference: For more information on VA’s duty to assist claimants in obtaining evidence, see
|
2. PL 112-154, Honoring America’s Veterans and Caring for Camp Lejeune Families Act of 2012, and its Impact on 38 U.S.C. 5103 and 5103A
Introduction |
This topic contains information about PL 112-154 and its impact on 38 U.S.C. 5103 and 5103A, including
|
Change Date |
June 29, 2015 |
I.i.1.A.2.a. PL 112-154, Section 504, Authorization of Use of Electronic Communication to Provide Notice to Claimants for Benefits |
PL 112-154, Honoring America’s Veterans and Caring for Camp Lejeune Families Act of 2012, Section 504, amended 38 U.S.C. 5103 to streamline VA’s duty to notify responsibilities.
These statutory changes, among other things, permit VA to
Important: Although PL 112-154 indicates that VA’s duty to notify responsibilities no longer apply when VA can award the maximum benefit based on the evidence of record, VA will refrain from implementing procedures in the manual on this issue until a substantive rule-making is implemented through VA regulation in 38 CFR 3.159.
Reference: For specific guidance on VA’s duty to notify, see
|
I.i.1.A.2.b. PL 112-154, Section 505, Duty to Assist Claimants in Obtaining Private Records |
PL 112-154, Section 505, amended 38 U.S.C. 5103A to streamline VA’s duty to assist responsibilities.
These statutory changes, among other things, permit VA to
Important: Although PL 112-154 indicates that VA’s duty to assist responsibilities no longer apply when VA can award the maximum benefit based on the evidence of record, VA will refrain from implementing procedures in the manual on this issue until a substantive rule-making is implemented through VA regulation in 38 CFR 3.159.
Reference: For more information on VA’s duty to assist claimants in obtaining private records, see
|
3. PL 115-55, Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017, and its Impact on 38 U.S.C. 5103 and 5103A
Introduction |
This topic contains information about PL 115-55 and its impact on 38 U.S.C. 5103 and 38 U.S.C. 5103A, including
|
Change Date |
February 19, 2019
|
I.i.1.A.3.c. PL 115-55 and Applicability of Duty to Assist |
VA’s duty to assist in the gathering of evidence begins upon receipt of a substantially complete application for an initial or supplemental claim and ends once VA issues a decision on the claim. The definition of a substantially complete application in 38 CFR 3.159 has been amended to add the requirement that a supplemental claim application include or identify potentially new evidence.
Important: The duty to assist does not apply to higher-level reviews (HLRs).
Reference: For more information on processing HLRs, see M21-5, Chapter 5.
|
I.i.1.A.3.d. PL 115-55 and Duty to Assist Errors |
VA’s duty to assist is reinstated when a substantially complete initial claim or supplemental claim is filed or when a claim is returned to correct a “duty to assist” error in a prior decision.
Reference: For more information on duty to assist errors, see M21-5, Chapter 5,5.
|
I.i.1.A.3.e. PL 115-55 and Duty to Provide Decision Notice |
PL 115-55 required a change to 38 CFR 3.103(f). Effective February 19, 2019, 38 CFR 3.103(f) requires VA’s written notification of decisions to include all of the following elements:
Note: These elements can be satisfied through a combination of the decision notice and its enclosures.
References: For more information on
|
4. Definitions Related to Duty to Notify and Duty to Assist
Introduction |
This topic contains information about definitions related to duty to notify and duty to assist, including
|
Change Date |
February 19, 2019
|
I.i.1.A.4.a. Definition: Relevant Records |
For the purpose of VA statutory duty to notify/assist, relevant records must
VA is not required to assist a claimant in obtaining identified records if no reasonable possibility exists that such assistance would aid in substantiating the claim.
Reference: For more information about relevant records, see
|
I.i.1.A.4.b. Refraining From or Discontinuing Assistance |
VA will refrain from or discontinue providing assistance in obtaining evidence for a claim if the substantially complete application for benefits indicates that there is no reasonable possibility that any assistance VA would provide to the claimant would substantiate the claim.
Circumstances in which VA will refrain from or discontinue providing assistance in obtaining evidence include, but are not limited to
References: For more information on
|
I.i.1.A.4.c. Claims That Are Inherently Incredible or Lack Merit |
VA will not provide assistance in obtaining evidence if a claim is inherently incredible or clearly lacks merit, even when the application itself is substantially complete.
The development or rating activity has the authority to determine whether a claim is incredible or without merit. For compensation claims, this may involve an allegation that a particular disability is secondary to one for which SC has already been established.
Important: VA employees have broad authority to determine whether or not a claim is inherently incredible or clearly lacks merit. However, before deciding such a claim, VA may request that the claimant submit evidence to render the claim plausible or credible.
Examples:
References: For more information on
|
I.i.1.A.4.d. Definition: Competent Medical Evidence |
Competent medical evidence means evidence provided by a person who is qualified through education, training, or experience to offer medical diagnoses, statements, or opinions. Competent medical evidence may also mean statements conveying sound medical principles found in medical treatises. It would also include statements contained in authoritative writings such as medical and scientific articles and research reports or analyses.
Reference: The definition of competent medical evidence for the purpose of this chapter is set forth in 38 CFR 3.159(a)(1).
|
I.i.1.A.4.e. Definition: Competent Lay Evidence |
Competent lay evidence means any evidence not requiring that the proponent have specialized education, training, or experience. Lay evidence is competent if it is provided by a person who has knowledge of facts or circumstances and conveys matters that can be observed and described by a lay person.
Note: When evaluating lay evidence,
Reference: The definition of competent lay evidence for the purpose of this chapter is set forth in 38 CFR 3.159(a)(2).
|
I.i.1.A.4.f. Definition: Substantially Complete Application |
Substantially complete application means an application containing
References: For more information on
|
I.i.1.A.4.g. Definition: Event |
Event means one or more incidents associated with places, types, and circumstances of service giving rise to disability.
Reference: The definition of event for the purpose of this chapter is set forth in 38 CFR 3.159(a)(4).
|
I.i.1.A.4.h. Definition: Information |
Information means non-evidentiary facts, such as the claimant’s Social Security number or address; the name and military unit of a person who served with the Veteran; or the name and address of a medical care provider who may have evidence pertinent to the claim.
Reference: The definition of information for the purpose of this chapter is set forth in 38 CFR 3.159(a)(5).
|
I.i.1.A.4.i. Definition: Initial Claim |
An initial claim is a substantially complete claim for a benefit, other than a supplemental claim, on an application form prescribed by the Secretary, including:
References: For more information on
|
I.i.1.A.4.j. Definition: Supplemental Claim |
A supplemental claim is a substantially complete claim for a VA benefit on an application form prescribed by the Secretary where an initial or supplemental claim for the same or similar benefit on the same or similar basis was previously decided.
Note: In order to be considered substantially complete, a claimant must submit or identify potentially new evidence with a supplemental claim.
References: For more information on
|
I.i.1.A.4.k. Definition: Reopened Claim |
The term reopened claim pertains to requests filed prior to February 19, 2019, for a benefit after the disallowance of an earlier claim for that benefit became final. This includes a claim in which SC for the same disability is reclaimed under a different theory of entitlement.
Example: A Veteran whose claim for direct SC for hypertension was denied in 2012 submits a February 1, 2019, claim for SC for hypertension on a secondary basis. Consider the claim for secondary SC to be a reopened claim because the same disability, hypertension, was reclaimed under a different theory of entitlement.
Notes:
References: For more information on
|
Here goes your text … Select any part of your text to access the formatting toolbar.