Updated Jun 28, 2024
In This Section |
This section contains the following topics:
|
1. Recording the Date of Receipt of Incoming Documents
Introduction |
This topic contains policies and procedures for recording the date of receipt on documents the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) receives, including
|
Change Date |
March 1, 2021
|
II.i.2.B.1.a. Requirement to Stamp the Date of Receipt on All Incoming Documents |
Each document submitted to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) must receive a stamp with the date of receipt.
The table below outlines requirements regarding the type of date stamps used by facilities and locations where VA has a presence.
Exceptions:
Note: The Digits-to-Digits (D2D) electronic claims service is a data delivery service built to enable a Veteran’s representative to electronically submit claims and evidence. The implementation agreement with the Veterans service organizations (VSOs) provides that if an electronic claim that met VA-specified D2D standards was not successfully submitted or did not result in a confirmation ID it will not be considered received by VA for the purpose of determining the effective date of the claim. A new claim must be successfully re-submitted through D2D. The date of claim will be the date of receipt of the successfully re-submitted claim.
References: For more information on
|
II.i.2.B.1.b. Handling Documents Processed Without a Date Stamp |
Use the guidance in the table below when attempting to determine the date the VA received a document processed without a date stamp.
Important:
Note: If the RO experiences unusual delays in the delivery of incoming documents (from the mailroom, intake site, other ROs, etc.), the Veterans Service Center Manger or Pension Management Center Manager may instruct employees to annotate the date the RO received the documents.
|
II.i.2.B.1.d. Date of Receipt for Mail Processed in the CM Portal |
Date of receipt for mail routed through the CM portal is determined by the earliest official date
Notes:
Reference: For more information on editing document properties in VBMS, see the VBMS Core User Guide.
|
II.i.2.B.1.f. Handling Original Documents |
Claimants occasionally submit original versions of the following documents in support of their claims:
VBA no longer requires return of these documents to the claimant.
Note: Original copies of legal documents are not routinely required during claims processing. There is no mechanism in place to retrieve original documents once shipped to the scanning vendor.
|
2. Signatures
Introduction |
This topic contains guidance regarding acceptable types of signatures, including
|
Change Date |
December 2, 2020
|
II.i.2.B.2.a. Signature by X Mark or Thumbprint |
Accept signatures by X mark or thumbprint only if any one of the following individuals (or group of individuals) witness the mark or thumbprint:
References: For more information on
|
II.i.2.B.2.b. Signature by Pencil |
Accept signatures (or an X mark as a signature) that a claimant makes by pencil.
|
II.i.2.B.2.c. Low Quality Scanned Signatures |
In the event a low-quality scanned document is received, claims processors will interpret poor quality signatures as belonging to the proper claimant.
Note: Development for a duplicate signature is not appropriate when based solely upon the scanning quality of the signature received on a document.
|
II.i.2.B.2.d. Faxed and Photocopied Signatures |
Faxed or photocopied versions of original wet signatures are acceptable for VA purposes.
|
II.i.2.B.2.e. Signatures by VA Employees |
When authority exists for a VA employee to complete forms on behalf of a claimant, or when the claims process otherwise requires a signature by a VA employee acting in an official capacity, the employee may substitute a typed name, station number, and position title for a wet or digital signature.
|
II.i.2.B.2.f. Definition: Digital or Electronic Signature |
A digital signature is an encrypted digital code appended to an electronic document to verify that the document was created by a known source and has not been altered.
An electronic signature is a signature, or its equivalent, that is affixed to an electronic document.
Notes: For VA purposes
|
II.i.2.B.2.g. Acceptable Electronic or Digital Signatures |
VBA must be able to conclude that a signature is from the person purporting to sign regardless of the format of the signature. The requirement to determine the authenticity of a signature, whatever the form, is inherent in the administrative process.
Accept an electronic or digital signature or other image of a signature on a claim, decision review request, or legacy appeal for benefits, or associated form, unless there are clear indications of
Example: A claim is signed on February 1, 2017, with the claimant’s electronic signature. Subsequent correspondence indicates that the claimant passed away December 22, 2016. As the claimant was deceased at the time the claim was signed, there is clear indication of fraud. The signature must not be accepted.
References: For more information on
|
II.i.2.B.2.h. Procedures for Acceptance of Signatures |
The policy and associated procedures for acceptance of digital and electronic signatures, as expressed in M21-1, Part II, Subpart i, 2.B.2.g, are effective June 20, 2017, and apply to
|
II.i.2.B.2.i. Procedures for Review of Previously Rejected Signatures |
Follow the procedures below when a signature on a claim or legacy appeal was properly rejected based on policies and procedures in place at the time of rejection and a request for review of the prior claim is received.
Under prior policies and procedures, non-claim forms, such as certification statements that require claimant signatures, may also have been rejected due to improper electronic signatures. Subsequent development may have occurred to request a properly signed form. When a signature on claims-related material was properly rejected and the associated claim remains pending or a subsequent legacy appeal is received, consider the claims-related material to have an acceptable signature and proceed with consideration of the claims-related material in connection with the pending claim or legacy appeal.
|
II.i.2.B.2.j. Example of Handling a Previously Rejected Signature on a Claim |
Situation: A Veteran submits a claim on February 21, 2017, that includes an electronic signature. On March 12, 2017, the claim was properly rejected based on an unacceptable electronic signature under the guidance previously in place. The claimant was properly notified of the incomplete application and advised to submit a properly signed claim within one year to preserve the effective date of the claim. On June 21, 2017, the Veteran’s representative submitted a statement asking for review of the rejected claim based on the revised policy. A newly-signed claim form has not been submitted.
Result: The claim received on February 21, 2017, was properly rejected based on policies and procedures at the time of the rejection. However, as the request for review of the prior claim was received within one year of the date of receipt of the prior application (considered incomplete at the time) and is sufficient evidence to now complete the claim, the claim may be established with a date of claim of June 21, 2017, the date of receipt of the request for review. Any assignment of effective date for subsequently granted benefits must be established based on the date of receipt of the February 21, 2017, claim.
|
II.i.2.B.2.k. Example of Handling a Previously Rejected Signature on Claim-Related Material |
Situation: A Veteran submits VA Form 21-526EZ, Application for Disability Compensation and Related Compensation Benefits, on January 15, 2017, and the claim is accepted. It includes a claim for entitlement to individual unemployability (IU). VA Form 21-8940, Veteran’s Application for Increased Compensation Based on Unemployability, is subsequently submitted on February 22, 2017, but includes an electronic signature. Subsequent development was completed on March 5, 2017, advising the Veteran that the VA Form 21-8940 could not be accepted because it included an improper electronic signature. The claim received on January 15, 2017, remains pending. No VA Form 21-8940 has been received with a revised signature from the Veteran.
Result: As the claim of January 15, 2017, remains pending, accept the VA Form 21-8940 with the electronic signature and give full consideration to it as the claim for IU is developed and decided.
|
3. Procedures for Alternate Signers
Introduction |
This topic contains guidance on individuals who are authorized to sign claim documents, including
|
Change Date |
January 11, 2023 |
II.i.2.B.3.a. Individuals Authorized to Sign on Behalf of a Claimant |
Public Law (PL) 112-154, Section 502, amended 38 U.S.C. 5101 to authorize VA to accept an alternate signature on behalf of claimants or beneficiaries who
References: For more information on
|
II.i.2.B.3.b. Requirements for an Alternate Signer |
38 U.S.C. 5101 requires an alternate signer be at least one of the following:
Note: When the evidence of record includes documentation reflecting that a court or VA finding has been made concerning the claimant’s competency status, accept a signature of any of the following on behalf of a claimant without following the procedures for alternate signers:
Reference: For more information reviewing documents pertaining to a claimant’s competency status, see
|
II.i.2.B.3.c. Handling a Form or Application With an Alternate Signature |
When an alternate signer certifies or represents that they are an appropriate signer under the criteria set forth in 38 U.S.C. 5101, VA will generally accept the alternate signature in the absence of discrepant information.
Use the table below upon receipt of a VA form or evidentiary documentation signed by a third party.
Notes:
References: For more information on
|
II.i.2.B.3.d. Handling Discrepant Information on a Form With an Alternate Signature |
VA will generally accept an alternate signature in the absence of discrepant information as long as it meets the criteria listed in M21-1, Part II, Subpart i, 2.B.3.c.
Use the table below upon
|
II.i.2.B.3.e. Handling VA Application Forms With an Alternate Signer Certification |
Certain VA application forms include an alternate signer certification and acknowledgment paragraph.
Send the Incomplete Application letter with a VA Form 21-0972 to the alternate signer for clarification with a carbon copy to the claimant, and include the sample language in M21-1, Part II, Subpart i, 2.B.3.f, when
|
II.i.2.B.3.f. Sample Development Language for Alternate Signer |
When sending a letter to develop to the alternate signer, claimant, and/or beneficiary, use the sample language below if
|
4. Handling Outdated or Discontinued Forms
Introduction |
This topic contains information about outdated versions of forms, including
|
Change Date |
August 15, 2022 |
II.i.2.B.4.a. Accepting Outdated Versions of a VA Form |
A form becomes outdated when a newer version of the form is released.
In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act and associated policies and procedures of the Office of Management and Budget, outdated versions of forms can be accepted only in limited circumstances as the outdated versions of forms are no longer the official form prescribed by the Secretary of VA. For claims processing purposes, generally accept only the current version of a form.
Exceptions: Outdated versions of forms may be accepted only in the circumstances described below.
Notes:
References: For more information on
|
II.i.2.B.4.b. Determining the Date a Form Becomes Outdated |
In most cases, as described in M21-1, Part II, Subpart i, 2.B.4.a, a prior version of a form becomes outdated one year after the date that the form is revised. Determine the current version date of a form by referring to the
Note: The current version of the form normally provides the prior version of the form that has been superseded. This information is customarily located near the form number and version date at the bottom of the form.
|
II.i.2.B.4.c. Example of Outdated Form Determination |
As noted in M21-1, Part II, Subpart i, 2.B.4.b, information on the current version of the form can be used to determine whether a prior version is outdated.
Example: A Veteran submitted VA Form 21-526EZ on August 22, 2018, using the February 2016 version of the form. As of August 22, 2018, the current version of VA Form 21-526EZ is dated March 2018 as indicated by the version date on the form and the REVISION DATE field on the VA forms websites. The current version of VA Form 21-526EZ also shows that the February 2016 version was the prior version.
![]() A prior version of a form may be accepted for one year after the form has been revised as directed at M21-1, Part II, Subpart i, 2.B.4.a. Thus, the February 2016 version of VA Form 21-526EZ is acceptable through March 2019, one year after the current version date. The claim is valid, and development should begin.
|
II.i.2.B.4.d. Rejecting an Outdated Version of a VA Form |
When an outdated form must be rejected, return the form to the Veteran and POA, if necessary, using the procedures below.
|
II.i.2.B.4.e. Handling Discontinued Forms |
A form becomes discontinued when its creation and distribution is stopped without a replacement under the same form number and/or name.
When a form is discontinued, its use must cease effective on the date of discontinuance. Do not apply outdated forms policies and procedures, including those from M21-1, Part II, Subpart i, 2.B.4.a, to discontinued forms.
Example: VA Form 21-526, Veteran’s Application for Compensation and/or Pension, and VA Form 21-526b, Veteran’s Supplemental Claim for Compensation, were discontinued effective February 19, 2019. Do not accept a claim submitted on these forms on or after February 19, 2019.
Reference: For more information on reviewing evidence, see M21-1, Part V, Subpart ii, 1.A.
|