In This Section |
This section contains the following topics:
|
1. TBI
Introduction |
This topic contains information about TBI, including
|
Change Date |
January 10, 2024 |
V.iii.12.B.1.e. Determining the Issues in TBI Cases |
A claim for service connection (SC) for TBI may also be worded as a claim for “head injury” or “concussion.” A claim document mentioning any of the above must be sympathetically read and understood as a claim for all identifiable TBI residuals that can be attributed to one or more TBI events.
A claim for “combat injuries,” assault, automobile accident, fall, or other injurious events may also raise the issue of a TBI if there was an injury to the head.
As recognized by 38 CFR 4.124a, diagnostic code (DC) 8045, the external force of a claimed TBI event may result not only in brain injury but also in physical or psychological disorders distinct from brain injury residuals. An explosion, for example, may cause burns, muscle injuries, orthopedic injuries including amputations, and PTSD in addition to a brain injury. A TBI claim mentioning a specific traumatic event must be sympathetically read as a claim for SC for all disabling chronic residuals of the event.
Reference: For more information on determining the issues, see M21-1, Part V, Subpart ii, 3.A. |
V.iii.12.B.1.f. SC of TBI Residuals |
Brain injuries, even if mild, cause permanent changes within the brain. Even if residual impairment is not detected upon examination, the brain has been damaged in some way that is permanent in nature. When there is a current formal diagnosis of TBI and a positive nexus linking the diagnosis to the in-service injury, 38 CFR 3.303 allows for SC on a direct basis, even when the current examination indicates the TBI is not manifesting any current signs or symptoms or that it is resolved.
Notes:
Example: A Veteran files a new claim for SC of TBI in December 2019. The Veteran’s service records show a mild head injury in 2010. On the Initial Evaluation of Residuals of Traumatic Brain Injury Disability Benefits Questionnaire, the examiner selects the TBI diagnosis and marks all facets as normal. Post-service medical records do not show any complaints of disabling signs or symptoms.
Result: Grant SC for TBI under 38 CFR 4.124a, DC 8045, 0 percent.
|
V.iii.12.B.1.g. Evaluation of TBI Residuals |
Evaluate service-connected (SC) TBI residuals under 38 CFR 4.124a, DC 8045.
In every case, one evaluation should be assigned using the highest level of impairment assigned to any facet contained in the table “Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment and Other Residuals of TBI Not Otherwise Classified,” which has been incorporated into the Veterans Benefits Management System – Rating (VBMS-R).
Additional evaluations may be appropriate to assign as provided in M21-1, Part V, Subpart iii, 12.B.1.h and i.
Note: A medical classification of severity of the TBI at the time of the acute trauma from the TBI event has no bearing on evaluation for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) compensation purposes. It is not an evaluation factor and is not relevant to the application of the benefit of the doubt rule. Do not imply or state that initial severity classification was given weight in assigning a disability evaluation.
References: For more information on
|
V.iii.12.B.1.h. Multiple Evaluations and Pyramiding in TBI Cases |
In addition to the evaluation for TBI manifestations under the table “Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment and Other Residuals of TBI Not Otherwise Classified” in 38 CFR 4.124a, DC 8045 (and also incorporated into VBMS-R), manifestations of a comorbid mental, neurologic, or other physical disorder can be separately evaluated under another DC if there is a distinct diagnosis – even if based on subjective symptoms – and no more than one evaluation is based on the same manifestation(s).
Follow the policy in the table below.
References: For more information on
|
V.iii.12.B.1.i. Evaluating TBI and Comorbid Symptoms/ Conditions |
Use the table below when evaluating TBI and comorbid symptoms and/or conditions.
|
V.iii.12.B.1.j. Example of Evaluating TBI With Comorbid Conditions |
Situation: VA examination shows the Veteran has numerous behavioral/emotional symptoms (depression that severely affects the Veteran’s work and family relationships, frequent suicidal thoughts, confusion, apathy, and unpredictability) and meets the diagnostic criteria for both TBI and major depression. The examiner was unable to delineate which symptoms are associated with TBI and which are associated with major depression. In addition, the TBI examination found multiple physical complaints related to TBI, including vertigo, sensitivity to light, blurred vision, and subjective headaches. Evaluation under 38 CFR 4.130 criteria would result in the higher evaluation for the behavioral/emotional symptoms due to TBI and major depression.
Result: Assign an evaluation for the behavioral/emotional residuals under 38 CFR 4.130, DC 9434. Assign a separate evaluation under 38 CFR 4.124a, DC 8045 for the remaining physical symptoms and combine the evaluations under 38 CFR 4.25. |
V.iii.12.B.1.k. Opinion Evidence and Separate Evaluations of TBI and a Mental Disorder |
Ensure that sufficiently clear and unequivocal medical opinion evidence exists in the claims folder whenever there is a question of whether TBI and a mental disorder are distinct and can be separately evaluated. Veterans Benefits Administration decision makers are not qualified to make such determinations.
The opinion may be provided by either an examiner assessing the TBI or an examiner assessing the mental disorder as long as the individual offering the opinion is properly qualified.
If a medical provider cannot make the required determination without resorting to mere speculation, then careful consideration must be given to whether that statement can be accepted under Jones v. Shinseki, 23 Vet.App. 382 (2010). |
V.iii.12.B.1.l. Additional TBI Signs or Symptoms Upon Reevaluation |
When considering a claim for reevaluation of TBI, do not automatically concede that a new sign, symptom, or diagnosis is a residual of TBI simply because it is listed in M21-1, Part V, Subpart iii, 12.B.1.d or in the evaluation criteria.
If there is not competent evidence that the sign, symptom, or diagnosis is associated with the SC TBI, obtain medical clarification. |
V.iii.12.B.1.m. TBI and SMC |
Brain injuries may be associated with loss of use of an extremity, sensory impairments, erectile dysfunction, need for regular aid and attendance (A&A) (including need for protection from hazards of the daily living environment due to cognitive impairment), and being factually housebound or statutorily housebound.
Carefully consider eligibility for special monthly compensation (SMC) when evaluating TBI residuals.
References: For more information on
|
V.iii.12.B.1.n. Temporary Total Evaluations and TBI |
In cases of recently discharged Veterans, consider the applicability of a temporary 50-percent or 100-percent prestabilization evaluation under the provisions of 38 CFR 4.28.
Lengthy VA hospitalizations or surgeries with convalescence may also implicate consideration of eligibility for temporary total evaluation under 38 CFR 4.29 and 38 CFR 4.30. |
V.iii.12.B.1.o. Training and Signature Requirements for TBI Decisions |
All decisions that address TBI as an issue, including rating decisions, Statements of the Case, and Supplemental Statements of the Case, must only be worked/reviewed by a Rating Veterans Service Representative or Decision Review Officer who has completed the required TBI training.
Decisions for TBI require two signatures until a decision maker has demonstrated an accuracy rate of 90 percent or greater based on a review of at least 10 TBI cases.
References: For more information on
|
V.iii.12.B.1.p. Applicability of 38 CFR 3.114(a) in TBI Cases |
The rating criteria for evaluating TBI were changed effective October 23, 2008.
Under Note (5) of 38 CFR 4.124a, DC 8045, a Veteran whose residuals of TBI are rated under a version of the diagnostic criteria in effect before October 23, 2008, may request review under the current regulation irrespective of whether the disability has worsened since the last review. A request for review pursuant to this note will be treated as a claim for an increased rating for purposes of determining the effective date of an increased rating awarded as a result of such review, applying 38 CFR 3.114(a) as applicable. However, in no case will the award be effective before October 23, 2008.
Reference: For more information on liberalizing changes of law and VA issues, see M21-1, Part V, Subpart ii, 4.A.6. |
V.iii.12.B.1.q. TBI Special Issue |
Ensure that the Traumatic Brain Injury special issue indicator has been added in all cases involving claims for TBI by reviewing the VBMS profile screen.
Reference: For more information on special issue indicators, see
|
V.iii.12.B.1.r. Anoxic Brain Injury |
Anoxic brain injury is a condition resulting from a severe decrease in the oxygen supply to the brain that may be due to any of a number of possible etiologies, including trauma, strangulation, carbon monoxide poisoning, stroke, and many others.
As anoxic brain injury does not have its own unique DC in the rating schedule, it can be rated analogously, depending on the specific medical findings in a particular case.
Use the table below to determine the possible analogous rating.
Important: Follow the guidance in M21-1, Part V, Subpart iii, 12.B.1.h and i when considering the assignment of multiple evaluations for residuals.
|
2. Secondary Conditions Associated With TBI
Introduction |
This topic contains information on secondary conditions associated with SC TBI, including
|
Change Date |
April 16, 2020 |
V.iii.12.B.2.a. Secondary SC Under 38 CFR 3.310 |
38 CFR 3.310(d) was amended on December 17, 2013, to establish an association between TBI and certain illnesses.
In absence of clear evidence to the contrary, the following five diagnosable illnesses are held to be a secondary result of TBI:
Entitlement to secondary SC for these TBI-related conditions in 38 CFR 3.310(d) depends upon the initial severity of the TBI and the period of time between the injury and onset of the secondary illness.
Important: There is no need to obtain a medical opinion to determine whether the above conditions are associated with TBI when there is a TBI of a qualifying degree of severity.
Notes:
References: For more information on
|
V.iii.12.B.2.b. Evaluating the Initial Severity of TBI |
For purposes of determining the initial severity of the TBI, consider the factors from the table in 38 CFR 3.310(d). Review medical records and lay statements for evidence of
Reference: For more information on verifying in-service blast injuries, see M21-1, Part V, Subpart iii, 12.B.2.e. |
V.iii.12.B.2.c. Using the TBI Initial Severity Table in 38 CFR 3.310 |
The TBI does not need to meet all the criteria listed under a certain initial severity level in order to classify the TBI under that severity level.
If the Veteran’s TBI meets the criteria in more than one severity level, classify the initial severity at the highest level in which a criterion is met.
Because “normal structural imaging,” “abnormal structural imaging,” and “AOC greater than 24 hours” may be found at more than one severity level, classify severity based on other criteria in the table. If no other criteria are present, then determine the level of severity as follows:
If the level of severity cannot be determined based on the available evidence, then apply the provisions of 38 CFR 3.310 (a) and (b) and order a VA examination/medical opinion as necessary. |
V.iii.12.B.2.d. Evidence That May Be Relevant to the Initial Severity Factors |
Evidence that may be relevant in ascertaining the initial severity of TBI symptoms includes
Note: The evidence that establishes the initial severity of the TBI does not necessarily have to be contemporaneous to the injury as long as it relates to the condition of TBI at or shortly after the time of the injury.
Example: A Korean War Veteran submits a claim for SC for Parkinsonism secondary to his SC TBI. The Veteran’s discharge examination from 1954 mentions a history of TBI in service. However, it does not contain information sufficient to determine the level of severity of the initial TBI injury. The Veteran provides a statement that he experienced a loss of consciousness during the Battle of Chosin Reservoir. A review of prior VA examination reports reveals a history provided by the Veteran that he was told by fellow soldiers that he fell unconscious for almost an hour after two grenades exploded near him.
Analysis: Although service records do not reveal the specific level of TBI during service, the Veteran’s statement is credible, consistent with circumstances of his service, and therefore sufficient to determine that he experienced a moderate level of TBI during service. |
V.iii.12.B.2.e. Registry for Verifying Blast Injuries |
The U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Joint Trauma Analysis and Prevention of Injury in Combat (JTAPIC) has developed a registry of service members who were within 50 feet of a blast since mid-2010.
When existing Department of Defense records, to include STRs, are not sufficient to verify exposure to a blast injury that occurred since mid-2010, Compensation Service will contact JTAPIC to determine if there is a record of exposure.
Important: E-mail Compensation Service at VAVBAWAS/CO/214DADVISORYANDSRT if exposure to an in-service blast injury from mid-2010 to the present cannot be verified. Include the following information in the e-mail:
|
V.iii.12.B.2.f. Determination of Diagnosable Conditions as Secondary to TBI |
Use the table below to determine secondary SC for conditions listed in 38 CFR 3.310(d).
|
V.iii.12.B.2.g. Considerations When Establishing Secondary SC |
When evaluating TBI-related secondary conditions, avoid pyramiding when considering the initial TBI evaluation and symptoms that are now associated with the five secondary conditions. Also, consider Notes 1 and 2 under 38 CFR 4.124a, DC 8045, while ensuring that the claimant receives the highest overall evaluation under the provisions of 38 CFR 4.25 (Combined Ratings Table).
Depending on the most advantageous combined evaluation, it is permissible to reduce an existing TBI evaluation as long as the overall evaluation of both TBI and the separate secondary SC condition is not reduced. Use the combinator tool in VBMS-R to determine the combined evaluation of TBI and the secondary SC condition. Thoroughly explain the decision in the Narrative section of the rating decision.
Use the table below to consider symptoms which apply to both TBI and the secondary conditions listed in 38 CFR 3.310(d).
Reference: For more information on evaluating TBI residuals, see M21-1, Part V, Subpart iii, 12.B.1.g. |
V.iii.12.B.2.h. Action When Evidence Shows a 38 CFR 3.310(d) Condition |
Use the table below to determine how to proceed when evidence shows one of the five diagnosable conditions in 38 CFR 3.310(d).
|
V.iii.12.B.2.i. Determining Effective Dates for Secondary Conditions |
The rule authorizing VA to establish the five secondary TBI-related conditions in 38 CFR 3.310 is effective January 16, 2014.
This rule will be applied to all cases pending before VA on or after January 16, 2014, and does constitute a liberalizing VA regulation under 38 U.S.C. 5110(g) and 38 CFR 3.114. Apply these principles when determining effective dates and retroactive benefits.
Reference: For more information on 38 CFR 3.114(a), see M21-1, Part V, Subpart ii, 4.A.6. |