Updated Jan 29, 2024
In This Section |
This section contains the following topics:
|
1. Rating Claims for Presumptive SC of Undiagnosed Illness and MUCMI for Persian Gulf Veterans
Introduction |
This topic contains information about rating presumptive SC claims of undiagnosed illness and MUCMI for Persian Gulf Veterans, including
|
Change Date |
January 29, 2024
|
VIII.ii.1.C.1.a. Deciding SC for an Undiagnosed Illness or MUCMI |
The following information is required to determine whether service connection (SC) under 38 U.S.C. 1117 for an undiagnosed illness or medically unexplained chronic multi-symptom illness (MUCMI) is in order:
Reference: For more information on development requirements for presumptive SC claims from Persian Gulf Veterans, see M21-1, Part VIII, Subpart ii, 1.B.
|
VIII.ii.1.C.1.b. Determining Chronicity for Qualifying Disabilities |
To establish SC for a disability under 38 U.S.C. 1117, the claimed disability must be chronic, that is, it must have persisted for a period of six months.
Measure the six-month period of chronicity from the earliest date on which all pertinent evidence establishes that the signs or symptoms of the disability first manifested.
Notes:
Reference: For a discussion on the types of evidence that may be accepted to establish objective indications of a chronic disability, see M21-1, Part VIII, Subpart ii, 1.C.1.c–e.
|
VIII.ii.1.C.1.c. Role of the Veteran’s Testimony in Establishing Signs or Symptoms |
When considering disabilities under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. 1117, a Veteran’s lay statement describing his or her own symptoms of a qualifying disability takes on a greater importance than when considering other claims under direct SC principles.
First, as indicated in M21-1, Part VIII, Subpart ii, 1.B.2.a, the threshold for ordering an examination for an undiagnosed illness or MUCMI claim is low, as the claimant’s statement alone, describing symptoms, may be sufficient to trigger an examination.
Second, lay evidence describing symptoms unsupported by clinical findings is sufficient to establish SC under 38 U.S.C. 1117 as long as there is medical evidence showing that “no medical diagnosis” is present.
Important: The Federal Circuit, in Joyner v. McDonald, 766 F.3d 1939 (Fed. Cir. 2014) held that “neck pain,” that was unsupported by physical examination findings or laboratory tests, may establish an undiagnosed illness that causes a qualifying chronic disability. This demonstrates the importance of the Veteran’s testimony, which is essentially all that is needed for the examiner to characterize the symptoms as an “undiagnosed illness” and for SC to be granted, if all other SC requirements are otherwise met.
References: For more information on
|
VIII.ii.1.C.1.d. Role of Third Party Lay Evidence in Establishing Signs or Symptoms |
Lay statements from third party lay witnesses that are competent and credible may help establish the presence of objective indications of a chronic disability.
Such statements may cover
Reference: For more information on when evidence is competent and credible, see M21-1, Part V, Subpart ii, 1.A.
|
VIII.ii.1.C.1.f. Considering VHA Persian Gulf Health Registry Examinations |
In all cases when the Veteran has been examined as part of the Veterans Heath Administration (VHA) Persian Gulf Health Registry, ensure those results have been obtained and considered when rating the Gulf War (GW)-related issues.
Reference: For more information on developing for the Gulf War Registry examination, see M21-1, Part VIII, Subpart ii, 1.B.1.f.
|
VIII.ii.1.C.1.g. Rating Action to Take Based on Disability Pattern Determination |
The table below shows the rating action to take based on the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) examiner’s determination of disability pattern.
Important:
Important: As held in Gutierrez v. Principi, 19 Vet.App. 1 (2004) the Veteran is not required to provide nexus evidence linking a qualifying chronic disability to events in service, as long as the Veteran meets all other requirements in 38 U.S.C. 1117.
Reference: For more information on handling examination reports that do not contain the required determination of disability pattern, see M21-1, Part VIII, Subpart ii, 1.B.2.p.
|
VIII.ii.1.C.1.h. Evaluating Symptoms of Undiagnosed Illness and MUCMI as a Single or Multiple Issues |
The decision to evaluate multiple symptoms or signs of an undiagnosed illness or MUCMI together as a single issue or separately as multiple issues depends on the outcome most favorable to the Veteran.
Although evaluating multiple manifestations under a single body system will in most cases provide the maximum benefit, be alert to symptoms affecting fundamentally different body systems that may clearly warrant separate consideration.
Notes:
Reference: For more information on assigning a disability evaluation, see M21-1, Part V, Subpart ii, 3.D.
|
2. General Information About Rating Decisions for Undiagnosed Illness and MUCMI Claims
Introduction |
This topic contains general information about rating decisions for undiagnosed illness and MUCMI claims, including
|
Change Date |
January 29, 2024
|
VIII.ii.1.C.2.b. Using Hyphenated DCs for Undiagnosed Illnesses and MUCMIs |
Use of the hyphenated DC with the 88 DC modifier is required for all awards and denials of undiagnosed illnesses and MUCMIs under 38 U.S.C. 1117.
The table below describes each of the codes that comprise a complete hyphenated DC.
|
VIII.ii.1.C.2.d. Examples of Hyphenated Codes for Undiagnosed Disabilities and MUCMIs |
The table below contains examples of hyphenated codes that may be used when awarding or denying undiagnosed illnesses manifest by the 13 signs or symptoms or a MUCMI found in 38 CFR 3.317. For the second code, use a DC with rating criteria that most accurately evaluates manifestations of the disability.
Note: This list does not contain all possible hyphenated codes.
Reference: For more information on the 13 signs or symptoms of an undiagnosed illness or MUCMI, see
|
VIII.ii.1.C.2.e. Termination or Reduction of Benefits Previously Awarded |
Situations may arise that will require termination or reduction of payments previously awarded for undiagnosed illness or MUCMI.
Follow the normal procedures for reduction of benefits or severance of SC outlined in M21-1, Part X, Subpart ii, 5.B.
Notes:
Example: A physician indicates that the Veteran’s condition, which had previously been characterized as an undiagnosed illness and compensated under 38 U.S.C. 1117, is now a clinically diagnosed condition with a clear etiology, and the RO is unable to establish continued entitlement under any other SC provision. After following the due process procedures, a final rating effectuating the severance is prepared on October 10, 2023. As final notice of the adverse action will be sent that same month, the Rating Veterans Service Representative enters January 1, 2024, as the date of severance of compensation for that disability.
Reference: For more information on effective dates for reductions of discontinuance of benefits for certain disabilities due to undiagnosed illnesses, see 38 CFR 3.500(y).
|
VIII.ii.1.C.2.f. Persian Gulf Veterans’ Participation in VA-Sponsored Research Projects |
Effective December 27, 2001, 38 U.S.C. 1117 enacted protection of SC for disabilities awarded under 38 U.S.C. 1117 or 38 U.S.C. 1118 for Persian Gulf Veterans who participate in certain VA-sponsored medical research projects.
Exception: SC is not protected if the original award was based on fraud, or military records clearly show that the Veteran did not have the requisite service or character of discharge.
Note: A list of the relevant VA-sponsored medical research projects for which SC is protected is published in the Federal Register.
|
3. Requirements for Providing Adequate Explanation of Decisions on Undiagnosed Illness and MUCMI Claims
Change Date |
January 29, 2024
|
VIII.ii.1.C.3.a. Requirement to Provide Adequate Explanation of Decisions |
When awarding or denying SC for a condition under 38 U.S.C. 1117, the decision and decision notice must provide adequate reasons for the decision.
Important:
References: For more information on
|