Sorry for the mess!

The site is undergoing a massive update. All the content on the site still works but things just might look a little messy and disorganized. Most of the upgrades will probably be don by the end of the month. Thank you for your understanding!

Updated Sep 21, 2022

In This Section
This section contains the following topics:
Topic
Topic Name
1
2
3
4

1.  Jurisdiction for Special Act Awards

Introduction
This topic contains information on the jurisdiction for special act awards, including

Change Date
April 14, 2015

X.i.3.A.1.a.  Definition:  Special Act Award
A special act award is an award of benefits authorized under a private law.
Reference:  For more information on special acts, see 38 CFR 3.801.

X.i.3.A.1.b.  Determining Jurisdiction and Authorizing Special Act Awards
Use the table below to
  • determine jurisdiction of a special act claim, and
  • authorize a special act award.
If the special act …
Then the …
predetermines only that the condition for entitlement to compensation or pension has been met
Example:  Character of discharge or date of claim.
regional office (RO) retains jurisdiction of the case.
  • provides for payment of a fixed rate of compensation or pension to designated individuals, and
  • identifies the act as a special entitlement
Philadelphia Pension Management Center (PMC) retains exclusive jurisdiction of the case.
Note:  Regardless of jurisdiction, enter the following notation in the Remarks of the award to specify the particular special act under which the award is made:
Benefits authorized under [enter special act] approved [date].
Reference:  For more information on considerations in rating and authorization action with foreign residency jurisdiction, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart i, 3.A.3.

2.  Jurisdiction for Claims Involving Foreign Residency

Change Date

 September 21, 2022

X.i.3.A.2.a.  Jurisdiction Over Claims Involving Foreign Residency

 Jurisdiction over claims involving foreign residency is divided among the following offices:
  • the Pittsburgh RO for live compensation claims and dual claims
  • the Philadelphia PMC for all original service-connected (SC) death claims, including claims from the Philippines
  • the Milwaukee PMC for supplemental claims received from residents of the Philippines or claims based on Philippine service for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) where SC death was already granted, and
  • the Milwaukee and St. Paul PMCs for all foreign PMC claims not specified above.
Notes:
  • U.S. territories are not considered foreign residences.
  • All legacy appeals, including those for pension and survivor benefits are the jurisdiction of the appropriate decision review operations center.
References:  For more information on

3.  Considerations in Rating and Authorization Action With Foreign Residency Jurisdiction

Introduction

 This topic contains information on considerations in rating and authorization action with foreign residency jurisdiction, including

Change Date

 July 7, 2022

X.i.3.A.3.a. Determining Which Station Takes Rating and Authorization Action

 When additional evidence or information is received the office currently assigned by National Work Queue (NWQ) would generally complete authorization and rating action necessitated by the newly-received evidence. Exceptions:
  • The currently assigned station may not take rating or authorization action when the Pittsburgh RO, Philadelphia PMC, Milwaukee PMC, or St. Paul PMC has exclusive jurisdiction over the claim to which the newly-received evidence relates.
  • When the Pittsburgh RO, Philadelphia PMC, Milwaukee PMC, or St. Paul PMC is the assigned station, it may not take the rating or authorization action necessitated by newly-received evidence only if the immediate reassignment of the claims folder is required.
Reference:  For more information on claim jurisdiction and transfer, including the role of NWQ, see M21-1, Part II, Subpart ii, 3.

X.i.3.A.3.b. Authorization and Rating Action Taken by the Pittsburgh RO, Philadelphia PMC, Milwaukee PMC, or St. Paul PMC

 When it is appropriate for the Pittsburgh RO, Philadelphia PMC, Milwaukee PMC, or St. Paul PMC to take rating and authorization action based on receipt of additional evidence, the station must
  • complete the action
  • draft and send decision notice to the claimant and any representative (if represented), and
  • ensure that the rating decision, decision notice and award are present in the electronic claims folder.
Reference:  For more information on decision authorization and claimant notification, see M21-1, Part VI, Subpart i, 1.A and B.

4.  Routing Mail for Claims From Foreign Residents

Introduction

 This topic contains policies regarding routing mail for claims from foreign residents, including

Change Date

 September 21, 2022

X.i.3.A.4.a.  Determining Jurisdiction Over Mail From Residents of a Foreign Country
When mail is received for disability compensation, pension, or survivor claims and related legacy appeals for any foreign location, the mail will be processed in the Centralized Mail portal.
Use the table below when determining jurisdiction for mail related to pension or survivor claims processed by PMCs received from residents of foreign countries.
If the mail received is for …
Then refer the mail to the …
original SC death or burial claims
Philadelphia PMC.
a supplemental claim for DIC received from residents of the Philippines or claims based on Philippine service when SC death was already granted
Milwaukee PMC.
any PMC claim not covered in the previous rows from residents of a foreign country
Milwaukee or St. Paul PMC.
Exception:  For mail related to claims received from dependents residing in a foreign country, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart i, 3.A.4.b.
Notes:
  • American Samoa, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands (Rota, Saipan, and Tinian) are U.S. territories; they are not foreign countries.
  • Activate the Foreign corporate flash upon receipt of a claim or legacy appeal that
    • is subject to NWQ routing, and
    • was submitted by an individual with a foreign address.
References:  For more information on

X.i.3.A.4.b.  Claims From Dependents Residing in a Foreign Country
Jurisdiction over claims from dependents residing in a foreign country is based on the primary beneficiary’s place of residence and entitlement and not on the dependent’s place of residence.
Example:  A Veteran living in Salt Lake City, Utah, files a claim for disability compensation.  After the Salt Lake City RO awards entitlement based on a 50-percent disability evaluation, the Veteran’s dependent, who lives in Seoul, Korea, files a claim for an apportioned share of the Veteran’s benefits.
Result:  Because the Veteran resides within the jurisdiction of the Salt Lake City RO, this RO – not the Pittsburgh RO – is responsible for processing the dependent’s claim.