Updated Feb 28, 2024
In This Section |
|
This section contains the following topics:
|
1. General Information on SMC
Introduction |
|
This topic contains general information on SMC, including
|
Change Date |
September 22, 2020
|
VIII.iv.4.A.1.a. Definition: SMC |
|
Special monthly compensation (SMC) is an additional level of compensation to Veterans (above the basic levels of compensation payable based on disability ratings of 0 to 100 percent) for various types of anatomical losses or levels of impairment due solely to service-connected (SC) disabilities.
Reference: For more information on SMC, see
|
VIII.iv.4.A.1.c. Information to Request From an Examiner to Determine LOU |
|
When requesting an examination to determine LOU of an extremity, ask the examiner to furnish a
Do not request that the examiner
Note: If LOU cannot be determined upon review of an examination report, request an appropriate specialized examination.
References: For more information on
|
VIII.iv.4.A.1.d. Determining the Extent of Examinations in Claims Involving SMC Under 38 U.S.C. 1114(l) Through (n) |
|
Exercise considerable care when requesting examinations in connection with claims involving SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(l) through (n).
Example: A prior examination clearly established LOU of both lower extremities at a level preventing natural knee action. Do not request a complete medical examination if the only issue in question is the extent of involvement of one or both of the upper extremities. Instead, request an examination with a notation that the examination be restricted to the degree of functional impairment of the upper extremities.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.1.e. Considering Amputation or LOU of Extremities |
|
A determination as to LOU of a hand or foot is not restricted to organic loss; it includes functional LOU as well.
The relevant inquiry concerning entitlement to SMC is not whether amputation is warranted. Instead, question whether the effective function remaining is other than that which would be equally well served by an amputation with the use of a suitable prosthetic appliance.
Reference: For more information on determining entitlement to SMC based on LOU that is equivalent to amputation, see Tucker v. West, 11 Vet.App. 369, 374 (1998).
|
VIII.iv.4.A.1.f. Showing Entitlement to SMC in Rating Decisions |
|
Entitlement to SMC must be reflected in the Coded Conclusion section of the rating decision by
References: For more information on
|
VIII.iv.4.A.1.h. Mandatory Use of the SMC Calculator |
The rating activity must use the SMC Calculator to determine the appropriate SMC codes and SMC paragraphs to input into the Codesheet of the rating decision. Decision makers are required to upload the SMC Calculator results, whether from the legacy tool or the SMC Calculator included in the Veterans Benefits Management System- Rating (VBMS-R), in the claims folder.
When uploading the SMC Calculator worksheet results to VBMS, users should identify the worksheet by entering the following information:
Notes:
References: For more information on
|
VIII.iv.4.A.1.i. Use of VA Form 21-2680 in SMC Claims |
|
Medical providers within or outside of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) may complete VA Form 21-2680, Examination for Housebound Status or Permanent Need for Regular Aid and Attendance, to provide evidence that a claimant is in need of aid and attendance (A&A) and/or housebound benefits.
Notes:
References: For more information on
|
VIII.iv.4.A.1.j. Definition: Anatomical Segment |
|
The term anatomical segment as used in 38 CFR 3.350 refers to the separate sections of the body that comprise each anatomical region. The term anatomical region, as used in 38 CFR 4.55(b), is not synonymous with anatomical segment, as used in 38 CFR 3.350.
The musculoskeletal system within the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities located at 38 CFR 4.71a is divided into anatomical segments which include the
Notes:
Example: A Veteran is SC for amputation of bilateral feet, evaluated as 100-percent disabling. The Veteran underwent a total knee replacement. Following the temporary evaluation assigned after knee replacement, the knee is evaluated as 60-percent disabling. SMC (l) is warranted for the bilateral foot amputation, and SMC (p) is warranted under 38 CFR 3.350(f)(3) for the knee disability since it is an additional permanent disability independently evaluated as 50 percent or more. The knee and the foot are separate anatomical segments as is required in 38 CFR 3.350(f)(3) and (4). Since the knee disability involves a separate anatomical segment, the SMC (p) may be assigned in spite of the fact that the disabilities are of a common bodily system.
|
2. Combining Disabilities When Entitlement to SMC Is at Issue
Introduction |
|
This topic contains information on combining disabilities when entitlement to SMC is at issue, including
|
Change Date |
January 5, 2016
|
VIII.iv.4.A.2.a. When Multiple Disabilities Should Not Be Evaluated as a Single Disability |
|
Do not rate multiple disabilities as a single disability if there is a possibility of entitlement to
|
VIII.iv.4.A.2.b. Evaluating a Multisystem Disorder |
|
The assignment of a single evaluation of 100 percent for a multisystem disorder, based on LOU of two extremities, may overlook the disorder’s involvement in other body systems. This involvement might meet requirements for
|
VIII.iv.4.A.2.d. Cases Involving Loss of Anal and Bladder Sphincter Control |
|
Under certain circumstances, LOU of both lower extremities, together with loss of anal and bladder sphincter control, satisfies the requirements of 38 CFR 3.350(e)(2) for entitlement to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(o).
In such cases, separate ratings for loss of anal and bladder sphincter control are not required. Use SMC code 55 to award entitlement.
Reference: For more information on adding an SMC code, see VBMS Rating User Guide.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.2.e. Avoiding Separate SMC Assignments for L/LOU of an Extremity |
Do not assign SMC for
If a Veteran has L/LOU of a leg, the L/LOU of the foot of the same leg is subsumed in the level of SMC assigned to the leg. Similarly, if a Veteran has L/LOU of an arm, the L/LOU of the hand of the same arm is subsumed in the level of SMC assigned to the arm.
Reference: For more information on avoiding separate assignments for L/LOU of an extremity, see Guillory v. Shinseki, 669 F.3d 1214 (Fed. Cir. 2012).
|
3. Hospital Adjustments Under 38 CFR 3.552
Introduction |
|
This topic contains information on hospital adjustments under 38 CFR 3.552, including
|
Change Date |
June 16, 2015
|
VIII.iv.4.A.3.a. Specifying the Basis of Entitlement Under 38 CFR 3.552 in the Rating Decision |
|
The rating decision must specify the basis of the Veteran’s entitlement to a hospital adjustment in order to ensure the proper application of 38 CFR 3.552.
The SMC allowance for A&A must be discontinued during hospitalization at government expense, unless the need for A&A is due to
Exception: The SMC allowance for A&A must be discontinued during hospitalization, regardless of the disability involved, if entitlement is established under
Note: Regardless of pre-existing paraplegia, SMC is payable at the rate prescribed in 38 U.S.C. 1114(n) to a claimant who is entitled to compensation for bilateral disarticulation of the hips under 38 U.S.C. 1151 per VAOPGCPREC 30-1997.
References: For more information on entitlement to a higher A&A allowance under
|
VIII.iv.4.A.3.b. Consequences of an Improperly Assigned SMC Hospital Code |
|
The assignment of an improper SMC hospital code may result in erroneous adjustment of the Veteran’s award upon hospitalization.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.3.c. Example 1: Rating Decision With a Properly Assigned SMC Hospital Code |
|
Situation: The Veteran has
Result: Entitlement under 38 U.S.C. 1114(r)(1) is warranted based upon the need for A&A; entitlement under 38 U.S.C. 1114(l) is also warranted for the bilateral amputations.
Coded Conclusion: The proper
|
VIII.iv.4.A.3.d. Example 2: Rating Decision With a Properly Assigned SMC Hospital Code |
|
Situation: The Veteran has a
Result: Entitlement under 38 U.S.C. 1114(m) is warranted based upon the need for A&A plus an additional 100-percent disability.
Coded Conclusion: The proper
|
4. Entitlement to SMC Under 38 U.S.C. 1114(k)
Introduction |
|
This topic contains information on entitlement to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(k), including
|
Change Date |
September 9, 2019
|
VIII.iv.4.A.4.a. Eligibility Criteria for SMC Under 38 U.S.C. 1114(k) |
|
SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(k) is payable for the following levels of impairment:
|
VIII.iv.4.A.4.b. History of SMC for L/LOU of a Creative Organ |
|
Public Law (PL) 82-427, which went into effect August 1, 1952, provided for the payment of SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(k) for L/LOU of a creative organ.
38 CFR 3.114(a), which provides instructions for assigning effective dates pursuant to liberalizing law or VA policy, became effective December 1, 1962. Accordingly, the proper effective date for awarding entitlement to a Veteran who was otherwise eligible for SMC on August 1, 1952, based on L/LOU of a creative organ, is the earlier of the following two dates, but no earlier than December 1, 1962
Note: The provisions of 38 CFR 3.114 do not apply to Female Sexual Arousal Disorder (FSAD). Entitlement to SMC(k) should be established based on the date service connection (SC) for FSAD was established.
References: For more information on
|
VIII.iv.4.A.4.c. Awarding SMC for L/LOU of a Creative Organ |
|
Award SMC based on L/LOU of a creative organ, if medical evidence of record shows
Note: SC for prostate cancer does not automatically result in an award of SMC for LOU of a creative organ at the (k) rate unless the prostate cancer was treated by radical prostatectomy.
References: For more information on
|
VIII.iv.4.A.4.d. Basis for Considering Entitlement to SMC for L/LOU of a Creative Organ |
|
The issue of entitlement to SMC for L/LOU of a creative organ may be
Undertake any development necessary, including submission of a request for a special examination, if there is a reasonable probability of entitlement.
Notes:
References: For more information on
|
VIII.iv.4.A.4.e. Awarding SMC for LOU of a Hand or Foot |
|
Award SMC for LOU of a hand or a foot when function is no better than if the hand or foot were amputated and replaced by prosthesis.
When considering LOU, determine whether the following activities could be accomplished equally well by a prosthesis
References: For more information on
|
VIII.iv.4.A.4.f. Other Medical Indications of LOU of the Foot |
|
Other medical indications of LOU of the foot include
|
VIII.iv.4.A.4.g. Awarding SMC for LOU of Both Buttocks |
|
Award SMC for LOU of both buttocks when there is severe damage by disease or injury to muscle group XVII (the gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, and gluteus minimus), bilaterally, which renders the Veteran unable to complete the following actions
Note: Assistance performing the physical actions listed above includes the use of the person’s own hands or arms and a special appliance for postural stability.
Reference: For more information on LOU of the buttocks, see 38 CFR 3.350(a)(3).
|
VIII.iv.4.A.4.h. Awarding SMC for Deafness |
|
Award SMC for deafness of both ears, having absence of air and bone conduction, if the SC bilateral hearing loss warrants a 100-percent evaluation under the evaluation criteria in 38 CFR 4.85 and 38 CFR 4.86 for hearing impairment.
A Veteran with bilateral SC hearing impairment, numerically designated as XI, is entitled to SMC, regardless of whether or not measurable hearing impairment was noted on entrance into service and SC was awarded based on aggravation of a pre-existing disability.
Notes:
|
VIII.iv.4.A.4.i. Awarding SMC for Complete Organic Aphonia |
|
Award SMC for complete organic aphonia if a disability of the organs of speech exists that constantly precludes communication by speech and
Notes:
|
VIII.iv.4.A.4.j. Awarding SMC for LOU or Blindness of One Eye |
|
Award SMC for LOU or blindness of one eye, having LPO, when the Veteran is unable to
Note: SMC is also payable for the anatomical loss of an eye.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.4.k. Awarding SMC for Loss of Breast Tissue |
|
Entitlement to SMC for loss of tissue from one or both breasts is limited to female Veterans.
PL 107-330, enacted December 6, 2002, provides for the payment of SMC
Note: Before enactment of PL 107-330, entitlement to SMC existed only upon complete surgical removal of breast tissue (or the equivalent loss of breast tissue due to injury), which included radical mastectomy, modified radical mastectomy, and simple (or total) mastectomy.
Reference: For more information on entitlement to SMC for loss of breast tissue, see 38 CFR 4.116.
|
5. SMC for Blindness With Other Disabilities Affecting Hearing and the Extremities
Introduction |
|
This topic contains information on SMC for blindness with other disabilities affecting hearing and the extremities, including
|
Change Date |
June 16, 2015
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.a. Basic Criteria for Entitlement to SMC (l) |
|
The SMC rate payable under 38 U.S.C. 1114(l) is authorized for the following SC disabilities:
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.b. Basic Criteria for Entitlement to SMC (m) |
|
The SMC rate payable under 38 U.S.C. 1114(m) is authorized for the following disabilities
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.c. General Criteria for Entitlement to SMC for Blindness With Hearing Loss or L/LOU of an Extremity |
|
Additional SMC is payable to Veterans with bilateral blindness who are already entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(l) through (n) who also have varying degrees of SC hearing loss or SC L/LOU of an extremity.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.d. SMC for Bilateral Deafness Evaluated as 60 Percent or More and Bilateral Visual Acuity of 20/200 or Less |
|
A Veteran is entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C.1114(o) if the Veteran has a combination of
Note: Before the enactment of PL 110-157 on December 26, 2007, SC blindness with bilateral visual acuity of 5/200 (1.5/60) or less was required for entitlement to SMC under 38 U.S.C.1114(o).
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.e. SMC for Total SC Deafness in One Ear and Bilateral Blindness |
|
A Veteran with total SC deafness in one ear, such as that numerically designated as “XI,” and SC blindness with
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.f. Example 1: Rating Decision Involving SMC for Total SC Deafness in One Ear and Bilateral Blindness |
|
Situation: The Veteran has
Result: Since the Veteran has LPO bilaterally, and total SC loss of hearing in the left ear, entitlement to SMC is warranted under
Coded Conclusion:
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.g. Example 2: Rating Decision Involving SMC for Total SC Deafness in One Ear and Bilateral Blindness |
|
Situation: The Veteran has
Result: The Veteran is entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(m) for the degree of bilateral blindness alone, but an additional one-half step in the level of SMC (“m½”) is warranted, based on the degree of hearing loss, under the provisions of 38 CFR 3.350(f)(2)(iv).
Coded Conclusion:
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.h. SMC for Bilateral Blindness With Bilateral Hearing Loss Considered 10- or 20-Percent Disabling |
|
A Veteran is entitled to an additional one-half step in the level of SMC under 38 CFR 3.350(f)(2)(v) if the SC disabilities include
Note: If visual acuity in either of the eyes is better than LPO, entitlement to the additional one-half step does not exist.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.i. Example 1: Rating Decision Involving SMC for Bilateral Blindness With Bilateral Hearing Loss Considered 10- or 20-Percent Disabling |
|
Situation: The Veteran has
Result: The appropriate level of SMC for the degree of blindness alone is “m½.” However, an additional one-half step is warranted based on the degree of hearing loss, making the Veteran entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(n).
Coded Conclusion:
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.j. Example 2: Rating Decision Involving SMC for Bilateral Blindness With Bilateral Hearing Loss Considered 10- or 20-Percent Disabling |
|
Situation: The Veteran has
Result: Since visual acuity in the right eye is better than LPO, do not apply 38 CFR 3.350(f)(2)(v). The Veteran is entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(m).
Coded Conclusion:
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.k. SMC for Bilateral Blindness With Bilateral Hearing Loss Considered 30-Percent Disabling |
|
A Veteran is entitled to an additional full step in the level of SMC, not to exceed that provided by 38 U.S.C. 1114(o) and 38 CFR 3.350(f)(2)(vi), if the SC disabilities include
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.l. Example: Rating Decision Involving SMC for Bilateral Blindness With Bilateral Hearing Loss Considered 30-Percent Disabling |
|
Situation: The Veteran has
Result: The Veteran is entitled to SMC under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. 1114(m) for the degree of blindness alone. However, an additional full step is warranted under the provisions of 38 CFR 3.350(f)(2)(vi), thereby entitling the Veteran to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(n).
Coded Conclusion:
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.m. SMC for Bilateral Blindness With Bilateral Hearing Loss Considered 40-Percent Disabling |
|
A Veteran is entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(o) and 38 CFR 3.350(e)(1)(iv) if the SC disabilities include
Note: If bilateral blindness is present, but visual acuity in either eye is better than LPO, the Veteran is entitled to an additional full step only in the level of SMC, not to exceed that provided by 38 U.S.C. 1114(o), per 38 CFR 3.350(f)(2)(vi).
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.n. Example 1: Rating Decision Involving SMC for Bilateral Blindness With Bilateral Hearing Loss Considered 40-Percent Disabling |
|
Situation: The Veteran has
Result: The appropriate level of SMC for the degree of bilateral blindness alone is “m ½.” However, apply 38 CFR 3.350(e)(1)(iv) because of the coexisting hearing loss. The Veteran is accordingly entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(o).
Coded Conclusion:
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.o. Example 2: Rating Decision Involving SMC for Bilateral Blindness With Bilateral Hearing Loss Considered 40-Percent Disabling |
|
Situation: The Veteran has
Result: The Veteran is entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(m) for the degree of bilateral blindness alone. However, because of the degree of hearing loss present, increase the level of SMC by a full step under the provisions of 38 CFR 3.350(f)(2)(vi) and award SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(n).
Coded Conclusion:
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.p. SMC for Bilateral Blindness With Bilateral Hearing Loss Considered 60-Percent Disabling |
|
A Veteran is entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(o) and 38 CFR 3.350(e)(1)(iii) if the SC disabilities include
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.q. Example: Rating Decision Involving SMC for Bilateral Blindness With Bilateral Hearing Loss Considered 60-Percent Disabling |
|
Situation: The Veteran has
Result: Due to the coexisting blindness and hearing loss, the Veteran is entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(o) and 38 CFR 3.350(e)(1)(iii).
Coded Conclusion:
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.r. SMC for Bilateral Blindness With L/LOU of an Extremity Considered at Least 50-Percent Disabling |
|
The provisions of 38 CFR 3.350(f)(2)(vii)(A) and 38 CFR 3.350(f)(2)(vii)(B) allow for an additional full step of SMC, not to exceed entitlement under 38 U.S.C. 1114(o), if the Veteran has
Note: Payment of this additional full step of SMC is in addition to the SMC payable under 38 CFR 3.350(a).
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.s. Example: Rating Decision Involving SMC for Bilateral Blindness With L/LOU of an Extremity Considered at Least 50-Percent Disabling |
|
Situation: The Veteran has
Result: The Veteran is entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(l) for the degree of blindness alone. The Veteran is also entitled to an additional full step of SMC, plus SMC under 38 CFR 3.350(a), for LOU of the right hand. Accordingly, the appropriate level of SMC is “m+k.”
Coded Conclusion:
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.t. SMC for Bilateral Blindness With L/LOU of a Lower Extremity Considered Less Than 50-Percent Disabling |
|
A Veteran is entitled to an additional one-half step of SMC under 38 CFR 3.350(f)(2)(vii)(C) if the SC disabilities include
Note: The level of SMC may not exceed that provided by 38 U.S.C. 1114(o).
|
VIII.iv.4.A.5.u. Example: Rating Decision Involving SMC for Bilateral Blindness With L/LOU of a Lower Extremity Considered Less Than 50-Percent Disabling |
|
Situation: The Veteran has
Result: The Veteran is entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(l) based on the degree of blindness alone. The Veteran is also entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(k) for loss of the right foot. The appropriate level of SMC, therefore, is “l+k.” Award an additional one-half step of SMC (l½ +k) under the provisions of 38 CFR 3.350(f)(2)(vii)(C).
Coded Conclusion:
Note: The SMC Calculator will ask whether the Veteran was on active duty after September 11, 2001. Answering Yes to that question prompts additional questions regarding the Veteran’s ability to ambulate with and without the use of ambulation aides. Answering No to the question of whether the Veteran was on active duty after September 11, 2001, does not prompt any additional questions. Depending on the answers provided to the additional prompts, the resulting SMC paragraph code and coding may differ from the example provided.
|
6. SMC for Additional 50- and 100-Percent Evaluations Under 38 CFR 3.350(f)(3) and 38 CFR 3.350(f)(4)
Introduction |
|
This topic contains information on SMC for additional 50- and 100-percent evaluations under 38 CFR 3.350(f)(3) and 38 CFR 3.350(f)(4),including information on
|
Change Date |
June 7, 2018
|
VIII.iv.4.A.6.a. Proper Application of 38 CFR 3.350(f)(3) and 38 CFR 3.350(f)(4) |
|
Apply the provisions of 38 CFR 3.350(f)(3) or 38 CFR 3.350(f)(4), whichever is appropriate, only once in a rating decision.
Important: Concurrent entitlement to SMC under both 38 CFR 3.350(f)(3) and 38 CFR 3.350(f)(4) is prohibited.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.6.b. SMC Under 38 CFR 3.350(f)(3) |
|
A Veteran entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(l) through (n) is entitled to the next higher intermediate rate of SMC under the provisions of 38 CFR 3.350(f)(3) if the SC disabilities include an additional single permanent disability, or a combination of disabilities, that is independently evaluated as 50-percent or more disabling.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.6.c. SMC Under 38 CFR 3.350(f)(4) |
|
A Veteran who is entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(l) through (n) is entitled to the next higher statutory rate of SMC under the provisions of 38 CFR 3.350(f)(4) if the SC disabilities include an additional single permanent disability that is independently evaluated as 100-percent disabling, apart from any consideration of individual unemployability (IU).
Note: Per Bradley v. Peake, 22 Vet.App. 280 (2008), do not define “single disability” in accordance with 38 CFR 4.16, as this regulation applies only to total disability based on IU.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.6.d. Permanence Requirement for SMC Under 38 CFR 3.350(f)(3) and 38 CFR 3.350(f)(4) |
Disability evaluations used to support entitlement under 38 CFR 3.350(f)(3) and 38 CFR 3.350(f)(4) must be permanent with no future review examination scheduled.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.6.e. Example 1: Rating Decision Involving SMC Under 38 CFR 3.350(f)(3) |
|
Situation: The Veteran has SC disabilities as shown below and qualifies for
Result: As provided in 38 CFR 3.350(f)(3), in addition to and independent of the disability for which SMC is payable under 38 U.S.C. 1114(m), the following permanent disabilities exist that are independently ratable as 50-percent disabling
Accordingly, the requirements of 38 CFR 3.350(f)(3) are met for the rate intermediate between 38 U.S.C. 1114(m) and 38 U.S.C. 1114(n), plus rates under 38 U.S.C. 1114(k).
Coded Conclusion:
5106 AMPUTATION, BOTH HANDS AT WRIST 100 percent from 02/01/2010. 6064 BLINDNESS, RIGHT EYE, LIGHT PERCEPTION ONLY; LEFT 20/20
30 percent from 02/01/2010. 7524 REMOVAL OF BOTH TESTES
30 percent from 02/01/2010. COMBINED EVALUATION FOR COMPENSATION:
100 percent from 02/01/2010. K-1 Entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(k) and 38 CFR 3.350(a) on account of blindness of one eye, having light perception only, from 02/01/2010.
K-1 Entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(k) and 38 CFR 3.350(a) on account of anatomical loss of a creative organ from 02/01/2010.
M-1 Entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(m) and 38 CFR 3.350(c) on account of anatomical loss of both hands from 02/01/2010.
P-1 Entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(p) and 38 CFR 3.350(f)(3) at the rate intermediate between 38 U.S.C. 1114(m) and 38 U.S.C. 1114(n) on account of anatomical loss of both hands with additional disabilities of blindness of the right eye, having light perception only, and removal of both testes, independently ratable as 50-percent disabling or more from 02/01/2010.
Note: The appropriate SMC coding is 31-31-11-23-1.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.6.f. Example 2: Rating Decision Involving SMC Under 38 CFR 3.350(f)(4) |
|
Situation: The Veteran has anatomical loss of both lower extremities that meets the requirements for SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(m) and a 100 percent SC evaluation for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) that is completely independent of the anatomical loss of both lower extremities.
Result: As provided in 38 CFR 3.350(f)(4), the Veteran is entitled to the next higher rate of SMC, 38 U.S.C. 1114(n), because of the additional, single, permanent disability that is independently ratable as 100-percent disabling.
Coded Conclusion:
SUBJECT TO COMPENSATION (1. SC) 5107 ANATOMICAL LOSS OF BOTH LOWER EXTREMITIES ABOVE THE KNEES
100 percent from 12/01/2010. 9411 POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER
100 percent from 12/01/2010. COMBINED EVALUATION FOR COMPENSATION:
100 percent from 12/01/2010. SPECIAL MONTHLY COMPENSATION
M-2 Entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(m) and 38 CFR 3.350(c) from 12/01/2010 on account of anatomical loss of one leg at a level or with complications preventing natural knee action with prosthesis in place, and loss of use of the other leg at a level with complications preventing natural knee action with prosthesis in place.
P-2 Entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114 (p) and 38 CFR 3.350(f)(4) equal to 38 U.S.C. 1114 (n) from 12/01/2010 on account of entitlement to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(m) with additional disability, posttraumatic stress disorder, independently ratable as 100-percent disabling.
The appropriate SMC coding is shown in the table below.
|
7. Entitlement to Additional SMC for L/LOU of Three Extremities Under 38 CFR 3.350(f)(5)
Introduction |
|
This topic contains information on additional SMC for L/LOU of three extremities under 38 CFR 3.350(f)(5), including
|
Change Date |
|
September 29, 2006
|
VIII.iv.4.A.7.a. Considering L/LOU of Three Extremities |
|
A Veteran with L/LOU of three extremities is entitled to additional SMC under 38 CFR 3.350(f)(5).
To determine the correct rate of SMC payable to a Veteran with the requisite degree of disability,
Notes:
|
VIII.iv.4.A.7.b. Example: Rating Decision Involving Additional SMC for L/LOU of Three Extremities |
|
Situation: The Veteran has the SC disabilities shown below and qualifies for SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(m) on account of the anatomical loss of both hands. Entitlement to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(k) for an amputation of the left foot also exists. In addition, the Veteran is entitled to an additional one-half step in the level of SMC, under 38 CFR 3.350(f)(3), due to the separate disabilities ratable as 50-percent or more disabling.
Result: The rate of SMC payable without regard to 38 CFR 3.350(f)(5) is “m½ +k.” Elevate this rate to the next higher rate authorized under 38 U.S.C. 1114(l) through (n), without loss of entitlement under 38 U.S.C. 1114(k). Accordingly, the rate of SMC payable in this case is “n+k.”
Coded Conclusion:
SUBJECT TO COMPENSATION (1. SC)
5106 AMPUTATION, BOTH HANDS AT WRIST
100 percent from 06/01/1996. 5165 AMPUTATION, LEFT FOOT, BELOW KNEE
40 percent from 06/01/1996. 7101 HYPERTENSION
20 percent from 06/01/1996. COMBINED EVALUATION FOR COMPENSATION:
100 percent from 06/01/1996.
SPECIAL MONTHLY COMPENSATION
K-1 Entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114 (k) and 38 CFR 3.350(a) on account of anatomical loss of one foot from 06/01/1996.
M-1 Entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(m) and 38 CFR 3.350(c) on account of anatomical loss of both hands from 06/01/1996.
P-1 Entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(p) and 38 CFR 3.350(f)(3) at the rate intermediate between 38 U.S.C. 1114(m) and 38 U.S.C. 1114(n) on account of anatomical loss of both hands with additional disabilities of amputation of the left foot and hypertension independently ratable as 50-percent or more disabling from 06/01/1996.
P-3 Entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(p) and 38 CFR 3.350(f)(5) at the next higher rate or intermediate rate of 38 U.S.C. 1114(n) due to loss of three extremities from 06/01/1996.
The appropriate SMC coding is shown in the table below.
|
8. Entitlement to SMC Based on the Need for A&A
Introduction |
|
This topic contains information on entitlement to SMC based on a demonstrated need for the A&A of another person, including
|
Change Date |
August 1, 2022
|
VIII.iv.4.A.8.a. Criteria for Entitlement to A&A Under 38 CFR 3.352(a) |
|
The criteria for entitlement to A&A, which appear in 38 CFR 3.352(a), mandate that the Veteran be so helpless due to physical or mental incapacity as a result of SC disability requiring the aid of another person to perform the personal functions required in everyday living.
References: For more information on
|
VIII.iv.4.A.8.b. Considering the Level of Disability Required for Entitlement to A&A |
|
A single disability evaluated as 100-percent disabling under a schedular evaluation is generally a prerequisite for entitlement to A&A. Any lesser disability would be incompatible with the requirements of 38 CFR 3.352(a).
Explanation: Both the nature of the impairment (being in need of regular A&A) and the compensation indicate that a greater level of disability is required for entitlement to the additional allowance for A&A than for
Important:
Exception: Claims processed under the relaxed standard per the October 2014 Veterans Service Center Manager Bulletin (from October 16, 2014 through December 18, 2015) will not be affected.
Note: The following represent a “single disability” for purposes of establishing entitlement to SMC (l):
Example 1: A Veteran is SC for Parkinson’s disease and has multiple disabilities related to the disease that result in a combined 100-percent schedular evaluation. If the evidence shows that the disabilities related to the disease are so severe that the Veteran requires A&A, entitlement to SMC (l) must be awarded.
Example 2: A Veteran is SC for amputation of right leg at the hip at 90-percent disabling. Pursuant to 38 CFR 3.310(c), SC is subsequently established for ischemic heart disease secondary to the amputation of right leg evaluated as 60-percent disabling. If the evidence shows the Veteran requires A&A due to the heart condition and right leg amputation, entitlement to SMC (l) is warranted.
References: For more information on considering entitlement to SMC based on need for A&A
|
VIII.iv.4.A.8.c. Considering Entitlement to A&A When the Evaluation for a Single Disability Is Less Than 100 Percent |
|
Use the table below when
Important: The evidence in the case must include the report from a current examination or its equivalent.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.8.d. Considering Permanence When Evaluating Claims for A&A |
|
Entitlement to SMC as discussed in 38 CFR 3.352(a) may be established based on the need for the regular A&A of another person without regard to whether such need is permanent.
Reference: For more information on considering permanence when evaluating A&A, see VAOPGCPREC 21-1994.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.8.e. Considering Entitlement to A&A as an Inferred Issue |
|
If a single disability is evaluated as 100-percent disabling, consider entitlement to A&A or the housebound rate as an inferred issue only if the evidence shows that the benefit may be awarded. If the evidence does not show entitlement to SMC at the A&A or housebound rate, do not raise either issue merely to deny it.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.8.f. Importance of Reasoning in Awarding SMC Under 38 U.S.C 1114(l) When Considering Entitlement to A&A Under 38 U.S.C. 1114(o) |
|
Make determinations of entitlement to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(l) on the basis of need of regular A&A in light of the criteria contained in 38 CFR 3.352(a). Fully explain the reasoning in the Narrative of the rating decision.
Notes:
Example: If a Veteran has LOU of both feet and is also being considered for the maximum rate under 38 U.S.C. 1114(o) because of the need for A&A, the need for A&A must be due to SC disabilities, completely independent of the LOU of both feet. When determining whether the Veteran needs A&A, disregard the disabling effects of the LOU of both feet. Show the need for A&A as due to a separate SC disability evaluated as 100-percent disabling.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.8.g. Coding the Rating Decision to Reflect Entitlement to A&A or Housebound |
|
Show entitlement to SMC, based on the need for A&A or evidence showing the Veteran is housebound, by
Reference: For more information on proper SMC coding to ensure the Veteran’s rate is correctly adjusted during hospitalization, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart iii, 1.C.1.f.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.8.h. Denying Entitlement to A&A |
|
If the Veteran or representative specifically claimed entitlement to A&A but the evidence does not support an award of A&A, dispose of the issue by explaining the reasons and bases of the decision to deny A&A in the Narrative of the rating decision.
Notes:
|
VIII.iv.4.A.8.i. Entitlement to A&A Under the Provisions of PL 96-128 |
|
PL 96-128 amended 38 U.S.C. 1114(r) concerning the awarding of A&A in cases where the SMC level is “n½ +k,” so that the SC disabilities used to establish entitlement to SMC at this level may also be used to establish entitlement to A&A if factual need is shown.
Under PL 96-128, entitlement to SMC under
Note: Prior to enactment of PL 96-12, a Veteran had to be entitled to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(o) in order to establish entitlement to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114(r)(1) and 38 U.S.C. 1114(r)(2).
|
VIII.iv.4.A.8.j. Drafting and Coding the Rating Decision Awarding Entitlement to A&A Under PL 96-128 |
|
If entitlement to A&A is established under the provisions of PL 96-128, then
Note: Pay the rate allowed for SMC at the “n½ +k” level, plus the additional amount allowed under 38 U.S.C. 1114(r)(1) or 38 U.S.C. 1114(r)(2), whichever is appropriate.
Reference: For more information on entitlement to a higher A&A allowance under 38 U.S.C. 1114(r), see M21-1, Part VIII, Subpart iv, 4.A.9.
|
9. Entitlement to a Higher A&A Allowance Under 38 U.S.C. 1114(r)(2)
Introduction |
|
This topic contains information on the statutory provisions for a higher A&A allowance, including information on
|
Change Date |
October 27, 2016
|
VIII.iv.4.A.9.a. Entitlement to a Higher A&A Allowance Under 38 U.S.C. 1114(r)(2) |
|
A Veteran entitled to the A&A allowance under 38 U.S.C. 1114(r)(1) is entitled to receive, in lieu of that allowance, a higher A&A allowance under 38 U.S.C 1114(r)(2) if the Veteran is found to be in need of, and receiving, a higher level of care.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.9.b. When to Award a Higher A&A Allowance Under 38 U.S.C. 1114(r)(2) |
|
Award the higher A&A allowance under 38 U.S.C. 1114(r)(2) only when the
Base eligibility to the higher allowance on medical certification that the Veteran meets the criteria set forth in 38 CFR 3.352(b).
Note: Entitlement to the higher A&A allowance may be awarded when an otherwise eligible Veteran is receiving residential or nursing-home care in an institution at the Veteran’s own expense. If such skilled service is provided at VA expense, this award may be subject to reduction under 38 CFR 3.552(b)(2).
Reference: For more information on entitlement to a higher A&A allowance when the Veteran is receiving residential or nursing-home care in an institution see
|
VIII.iv.4.A.9.c. Evidentiary Considerations for Higher Level of Care |
|
To establish entitlement to a higher A&A allowance, the evidence of record must indicate
Note: Entitlement may be established by evidence which shows the
|
VIII.iv.4.A.9.d. Processing Claims for Entitlement to a Higher A&A Allowance Under 38 U.S.C. 1114(r)(2) |
|
Follow the steps in the table below to process claims for entitlement to a higher A&A allowance under 38 U.S.C. 1114(r)(2).
|
VIII.iv.4.A.9.e. Possible Hospitalization Adjustment Under 38 CFR 3.552(b)(2) |
|
The A&A allowance, including that payable under 38 U.S.C. 1114(r)(2), is subject to possible hospitalization adjustment, or reduction, under 38 CFR 3.552(b)(2).
|
10. Entitlement to Housebound Benefits
Introduction |
|
This topic contains information about entitlement to housebound benefits, including
|
Change Date |
September 9, 2019
|
VIII.iv.4.A.10.a. Statutory Entitlement to Housebound Benefits |
|
The housebound benefit or SMC (s) is payable under 38 U.S.C. 1114(s) (38 CFR 3.350(i)) to a Veteran who has a single, SC disability evaluated as totally disabling, and
If the Veteran is entitled to housebound benefits by statute (without demonstrating need, under 38 U.S.C. 1114(s)), the additional disability(ies), evaluated as 60-percent or more disabling, must
Notes:
|
VIII.iv.4.A.10.b. Defining a Single Disability for Housebound Purposes |
|
A single disability evaluated as 100-percent disabling under a schedular evaluation is generally a prerequisite for entitlement to housebound benefits.
Exception: A total disability evaluation based on IU, which is in turn awarded based on one disability, satisfies the regulatory requirement of “a single SC disability rated as 100 percent” for the purposes of awarding SMC housebound benefits under 38 CFR 3.350(i).
Important:
Example – IU award based on a single disability: A Veteran is in receipt of IU based solely on depression evaluated as 70-percent disabling. Subsequently SC is granted for coronary artery disease (CAD) and a 60-percent evaluation is assigned. SMC (s) at the statutory housebound rate is awarded.
Analysis: The Veteran in this instance would be entitled to the statutory SMC housebound rate. Under Bradley v. Peake, 22 Vet.App. 280 (2008), awarding IU based on the single disability of depression satisfies the requirement for a single disability evaluated as totally disabling for purposes of SMC (s) entitlement. CAD is an additional disability evaluated as at least 60-percent disabling and is separate and distinct from the SC depression and associated IU.
Example – IU award based on multiple disabilities: A Veteran is in receipt of IU based on two SC disabilities: ankylosis of the right shoulder evaluated as 50-percent disabling and residuals of a left radius fracture evaluated as 20-percent disabling. Both disabilities are due to a motor vehicle accident (MVA) that happened during the Veteran’s active duty service. He is awarded IU based on the disabilities caused by the MVA. The Veteran’s separate issue of CAD is later SC and evaluated as 60-percent disabling. The CAD, by itself, does not render the Veteran unemployable. SMC (s) at the statutory housebound rate is not awarded.
Analysis: The Veteran in this instance would not be entitled to SMC at the statutory housebound rate. There is no single disability evaluated as totally disabling for the purposes of entitlement to SMC. Although the evaluations for the MVA injuries to the shoulder and left radius are considered to be a single disability for purposes of IU entitlement, they do not represent a single disability evaluated at 100-percent disabling for purpose of awarding SMC at the statutory housebound rate.
Reference: For more information on the single 100-percent disability requirement for SMC (s), see
|
VIII.iv.4.A.10.c. Extraschedular Consideration in Housebound Claims Involving IU |
|
When SMC at the statutory housebound rate is established based on a single condition that is totally disabling due to IU
When the evidence of record establishes potential entitlement to SMC at the statutory housebound rate due to a single disability resulting in IU status but the disability does not, by itself, meet the schedular criteria to establish IU entitlement, forward the case to Compensation Service for an extraschedular IU determination as directed in 38 CFR 4.16(b) for the purpose of deciding entitlement to SMC at the statutory housebound rate.
Example: A Veteran is SC for migraine headaches evaluated as 50-percent disabling and for multiple orthopedic conditions that combine for an additional 60-percent evaluation. The evidence shows that the migraine headaches prevent gainful employment. Although the criteria to grant entitlement to IU have been met as there are multiple disabilities that combine to 70 percent with one that is at least 40-percent disabling, entitlement to SMC based on statutory housebound status requires an extraschedular determination since the headaches, by themselves, do not meet the schedular criteria for the grant of IU.
References: For more information on
|
VIII.iv.4.A.10.d. Temporary Total Ratings Used to Award SMC (s) |
|
Temporary evaluations of 100 percent under 38 CFR 4.28, 38 CFR 4.29, and 38 CFR 4.30 of the Rating Schedule may be used as a basis for awarding SMC at the housebound rate.
Example: A Veteran SC for a knee disability is awarded a temporary total evaluation under 38 CFR 4.30 for two months following surgery. The Veteran is SC for PTSD, which is rated 70-percent disabling. SMC (s) will also be awarded while the total rating under 38 CFR 4.30 is in effect, as the separate PTSD evaluation of 70 percent establishes the basis for award of SMC at the housebound rate.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.10.e. Determining Whether the Veteran Is Permanently Housebound in Fact |
|
If entitlement is based on the Veteran being housebound in fact, the law requires the housebound state to be permanent.
Consider a Veteran permanently housebound if, as a result of a single, total disability, by itself or in combination with other SC disabilities, the Veteran is permanently and substantially confined to
Important: There is no requirement that either the single disability, evaluated as totally disabling, or the additional disability(ies), independently ratable as 60- percent or more disabling, be permanent in nature if SMC at the housebound rate is awarded on a statutory, rather than factual, basis.
Reference: For more information on substantial confinement to home, see Howell v. Nicholson, 19 Vet.App. 535 (2006).
|
VIII.iv.4.A.10.f. Determining Whether the Veteran Is Substantially Confined for Housebound in Fact Entitlement |
|
A housebound in fact determination requires a Veteran’s inability to leave his /her place of residence and immediate premises in order to earn any income. However, it does not require a total inability to leave the place of residence and immediate premises for all circumstances. Leaving home for medical purposes cannot, by itself, serve as the basis for finding that a Veteran is not substantially confined for purposes of SMC housebound benefits. The limitations must be the result of the Veteran’s SC disabilities.
Non-medical indicators of housebound status may include but are not limited to
Example 1: A Veteran is totally disabled due to SC diabetes mellitus and related complications. He leaves his house weekly for dialysis treatment. His SC conditions limit his ability to independently ambulate to less than 30 feet before requiring significant rest. The Veteran is entitled to SMC based on housebound in fact status as his inability to leave the home other than for medical visits demonstrates substantial confinement to place of residence and immediate premises. Furthermore, the diabetes mellitus and complications are so disabling that he is rendered unable to leave his residence and immediate premises to earn income.
Example 2: A Veteran is SC for multiple disabilities including CAD, which is totally disabling. His wife drives him to all medical appointments. If the Veteran experiences a good day, they may run some minor errands while out of the home. The Veteran is entitled to SMC based on housebound in fact status as leaving his home for medical visits does not preclude a finding of substantial confinement to his dwelling or immediate premises. Furthermore, the other visits where the Veteran’s activity is limited to minor errands does not preclude a finding of substantial confinement since the Veteran is not shown to be able to leave his place of residence and immediate premises in order to earn income.
Reference: For more information on determining whether a Veteran is substantially confined for the purposes of housebound determinations, see
|
VIII.iv.4.A.10.g. Protected Evaluations in Determination of Housebound Entitlement |
|
Consider any evaluation protected under 38 CFR 3.951 at its protected level.
For the purpose of determining entitlement to housebound benefits only, utilize ratings under the 1925 schedule, which are protected by 38 CFR 3.952 with ratings under the current Rating Schedule for separate and distinct disabilities.
Reference: For more information on protected SMC ratings, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart ii, 1.B.1.g.
|
11. Entitlement to SMC Under 38 U.S.C. 1114(t) Based on the Need for A&A for Residuals of TBI
Introduction |
|
This topic contains information about entitlement to SMC (t) based on the need for A&A for residuals of TBI, including
|
Change Date |
June 7, 2018
|
VIII.iv.4.A.11.a. Change in Law Establishing SMC (t) |
|
PL 111-275 amended 38 U.S.C. 1114 effective October 1, 2011, to authorize payment of SMC (t), which is equal to SMC (r)(2) for Veterans who
Notes:
Reference: For more information on evaluating TBI, see M21-1, Part V, Subpart iii, 12.B.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.11.b. Developing for SMC (t) |
|
General development rules apply to claims for SMC (t).
A medical examination and/or opinion may only be undertaken if the Veteran has already established SMC (l) due to the need for regular A&A.
If a VA medical examination, opinion, or both, are required, request a TBI examination.
Use the table below to determine the type of VA examination to request for TBI claims.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.11.c. Establishing Entitlement to A&A at the (l) Rate Prior to Rating for SMC (t) |
|
Before considering entitlement to SMC (t), the rating activity must establish entitlement to A&A benefits at the (l) rate.
Reference: For more information on the procedures governing awards for SMC (l) for A&A, see M21-1, Part VIII, Subpart iv, 4.A.8.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.11.d. Processing Awards for SMC (t) |
|
Veterans entitled to SMC (t) are entitled to payment at a rate equivalent to (o) plus the (r)(2) allowance. If entitlement to the (r)(2) rate is shown without regard to (t) provisions, process as a regular (r)(2) award.
When the Veteran is entitled only to regular A&A due to TBI, but would require hospitalization, nursing home care, or other residential institutional care in the absence of regular A&A, the Veteran should be paid at the basic code in the absence of other qualifying disabilities.
|
VIII.iv.4.A.11.e. Processing Hospitalization Rates for SMC(t) |
|
When inputting a decision awarding entitlement to SMC (t),
Notes:
Reference: For more information on reduction of SMC during hospitalization, see 38 CFR 3.552.
|
12. Entitlement to Special Monthly Spouse’s Compensation
Introduction |
This topic contains information about entitlement to additional compensation based on the need for A&A for a Veteran’s spouse, including
|
Change Date |
September 9, 2019
|
VIII.iv.4.A.12.a. Spousal A&A Criteria |
Increased compensation is payable to a Veteran by reason of the Veteran’s spouse being in need of A&A.
The spouse will be considered in need of A&A if the individual
Note: Special monthly spouse’s compensation may be granted by the authorization activity when the spouse’s nursing home status is confirmed, as discussed at 38 CFR 3.351(c)(2) and M21-1, Part VI, Subpart i, 1.A.3.b.
References: For more information on
|
VIII.iv.4.A.12.b. Requirement for a 30-Percent Rating |
For additional benefits to be payable for a spouse, including for special monthly spouse’s compensation ratings, the Veteran must be entitled to compensation for disabilities evaluated as 30 percent or more disabling.
Reference: For more information on handling claims for additional compensation for dependents from Veterans with a combined disability rating that is less than 30 percent, see M21-1, Part VII, Subpart i, 1.A.4.c.
|