Updated Mar 31, 2023
In This Section |
This section contains the following topics:
|
1. Overview of the Initial Mail Screening Process
Introduction |
This topic provides an overview of the initial mail screening process, including
|
Change Date |
August 30, 2018
|
II.i.2.A.1.a. Purpose of Initial Mail Screening |
The purpose of initial mail screening is to review all incoming applications, correspondence, and evidence to determine if a claim
References: For more information on
|
II.i.2.A.1.b. Overview of the Screening Process and Mail Flow |
The table below provides an overview of the screening process.
References: For more information on
|
2. Process for Conducting a Routine Check of Complete Claims
Introduction |
This topic contains information about conducting a routine check of original claims, including
|
Change Date |
June 16, 2020
|
II.i.2.A.2.b. Determining the Benefit Sought and Type of Claim |
Follow the steps in the table below to determine the type of claim.
|
II.i.2.A.2.c. Checking for the Proper Signature |
A complete claim for any type of benefit must be signed by the
Exceptions:
Important:
References: For more information on
|
II.i.2.A.2.d. Processing On-Line Applications Without a Signature |
While normal development procedures and rules of evidence apply to on-line application claims, the signature requirement for a substantially complete claim is set aside when a claim is filed electronically through an on-line application.
The table below summarizes the steps for processing an on-line application for benefits that a claimant submits electronically.
Exception: Claims may be submitted by powers of attorney through the Stakeholder Enterprise Portal (SEP) and do not require a signature. However, original claims submitted through SEP involve additional claimant signature requirements to be substantially complete.
Reference: For more information on claims for compensation submitted through SEP, including additional signature requirements for original claims, see M21-1, Part II, Subpart iii, 4.B.2.
|
II.i.2.A.2.e. Checking for Basic Eligibility to the Benefit Sought |
Consider the basic criteria for eligibility to the benefit sought.
Example: If the claim is for pension, consider whether or not the Veteran has sufficient wartime service or if the income and net worth are within limits.
Reference: For more information on VA benefit programs, see M21-1, Part I, Subpart ii, 2.
|
II.i.2.A.2.f. Checking for COD |
If the discharge document shows service that was not honorable, general, or under honorable conditions, review the claims folder for an administrative decision on the character of discharge (COD) or bar to benefits.
Use the table below to determine VA policies for reviewing the claims folder for an administrative decision.
|
II.i.2.A.2.g. Checking for Service Verification |
Service verification can be accomplished in various ways.
Reference: For more information on verifying service and COD, see M21-1, Part III, Subpart i, 1.B.
|
II.i.2.A.2.h. Checking for Blank Spaces on the Application or Insufficient Information |
If a claimant omits necessary information on an application, determine if it is substantially complete.
References: For more information on
|
II.i.2.A.2.i. Checking for Acceptable Dependency Information |
The table below shows the submission requirements for establishing dependents.
References: For more information on
|
3. Screening Subsequent Claims for Pending Appeals
Introduction |
This topic describes screening and processing subsequent claims that may be duplicative of a pending appeal, including
|
Change Date |
March 31, 2023
|
II.i.2.A.3.a. Screening Subsequent Claims for Pending Appeals |
Always check for pending appeals when screening subsequent claims.
Identify pending
Note: As of July 30, 2021, VA must accept a supplemental claim for an issue that is also pending before a Federal court. This includes cases before the U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, and the U.S. Supreme Court. BVA does not fall under this definition of a Federal court and is excluded.
References: For more information on
|
II.i.2.A.3.b. Processing Claims That Are Duplicative of a Legacy or BVA Appeal |
When a claimed contention is an exact match for an issue under a legacy or BVA appeal, consider the contention duplicative of the legacy or BVA appeal and follow the procedures outlined in M21-1, Part II, Subpart i, 2.A.3.c to notify the claimant the issue will be processed under the pending appeal.
When a claimed contention is not an exact match of an issue under appeal, establish a claim for the contention in accordance with M21-1, Part II, Subpart iii, 3.A.
Reference: For more information on determining if a legacy appeal is duplicative, see M21-5, Chapter 6, Section B.
|
II.i.2.A.3.c. Informing the Claimant That a Claimed Contention Is Already on Appeal |
Upon discovery that a claimed contention is duplicative of a pending legacy or BVA appeal, notify the claimant that the issue will be processed as part of the pending appeal.
Follow the steps in the table below to generate a letter informing the claimant of a duplicative contention.
Reference: For more information on determining if a legacy appeal is duplicative, see M21-5, Chapter 6, Section B.
|
4. Individual and Group Responsibilities for Division Mail Management
Introduction |
This topic describes mail management, including
|
Change Date |
September 30, 2010
|
II.i.2.A.4.a. Importance of Effective Mail Management |
Effective mail management is crucial to the success and control of workflow.
|
5. IPC CM Screening and Processing Functions
Introduction |
|
This topic provides an overview of IPC screening and processing functions in the CM portal, including
|
Change Date |
March 31, 2023
|
II.i.2.A.5.a. Super User Mail-Processing Role in the CM Portal |
|
The IPC Super User
Important:
Notes:
Reference: For more information on the role of the Super User in CM, see the Centralized Mail Portal User Manual.
|
II.i.2.A.5.b. Basic User Mail-Processing Role in the CM Portal |
|
The Basic User
Note: Routing of paper claims folders to scanning vendors is not necessary when the claim may be worked without claims-folder review. For example, claims for additional compensation for dependents eFolder are generally decided without claims-folder review.
References: For more information on
|
II.i.2.A.5.c. Processing Mail in CM |
|
Follow the steps in the table below when processing mail in CM.
|
II.i.2.A.5.d. Processing Solicited and Unsolicited Mail |
|
Solicited and unsolicited mail refers to mail submitted in association with development of a claim or legacy appeal.
Note: New legacy NODs and perfected legacy appeals (VA Form 9) are not types of solicited or unsolicited mail. M21-1, Part II, Subpart i, 2.A.5.c describes the proper procedure for handling new and perfected legacy appeals and other types of mail.
When processing solicited or unsolicited mail, update VBMS according to instructions in the following table.
Reference: For more information on processing CM, see the user manuals and other guides on the CM webpage.
|