Sorry for the mess!

The site is undergoing a massive update. All the content on the site still works but things just might look a little messy and disorganized. Most of the upgrades will probably be don by the end of the month. Thank you for your understanding!

Updated Apr 18, 2022

In This Section
This section contains the following topics:
Topic
Topic Name
1
2

1.  Reviewing Testimony

Introduction

 This topic contains information on reviewing testimony, including

Change Date

 October 26, 2018

V.ii.1.B.1.a.  Using Testimony as Proper Evidence
To be admitted as proper evidence, certain types of testimony must be sworn under oath or properly certified.
Examples:  Evidence from court proceedings, depositions, and so on.

V.ii.1.B.1.b.  Handling Unsworn or Uncertified Testimony
Make an exact copy of unsworn or uncertified testimony and return the original copy for notarization or certification to the
  • claimant
  • representative, or
  • person testifying.
Note:  Return unsworn or uncertified testimony only if the rating activity (or a Decision Review Officer) considers the evidence material to a favorable determination of a claim.
Reference:  For more information on certifying testimony, see M21-1, Part III, Subpart i, 2.D.3.

2.  Lay Evidence

Introduction

 This topic contains information about lay evidence, including

Change Date

 February 19, 2019

V.ii.1.B.2.a.  Acceptable Lay Evidence
Lay evidence is acceptable for the purpose of establishing service incurrence or aggravation, in the absence of service treatment records (STRs), for a combat Veteran or former prisoner of war (FPOW), if the evidence
  • is satisfactory
  • is consistent with the circumstances, conditions, or hardships of combat or FPOW internment, and
  • can prevail in spite of the absence of official records showing incurrence or aggravation of the disease or injury during service.
Important:  Medical evidence of a link to a current condition is still needed to establish service connection.
A non-combat Veteran’s lay statements may be acceptable for establishing service incurrence or aggravation but must be weighed against other evidence in the claims folder including the absence of military records documenting or supporting the statements.
References:  For more information on

V.ii.1.B.2.b.  When to Use Lay Evidence
Lay evidence is generally afforded probative value if it is provided by a person who has knowledge of facts or circumstances and conveys matters that can be observed and described by a lay person.
The value accorded to other types of lay evidence depends on such factors as
  • the accuracy or clarity of the individual’s memory
  • direct personal knowledge or experience
  • recency of the event, and
  • the competence of the reporting person.
A medically-untrained individual is not usually competent to offer a medical opinion regarding the etiology of disorders and such an opinion is generally assigned little probative weight.
References:  For more information on

V.ii.1.B.2.c.  Descriptions of Symptoms as Evidence
A claimant’s own statement, covering in sufficient detail a condition that is within the claimant’s ability to describe, such as their own symptoms, may to that extent constitute evidence.
Rationale:  While such statements have self-serving aspects, the claimant is often the most qualified source to describe the circumstances of the disabling effects of the disease or injury.