Updated Aug 16, 2024
In This Section |
This section contains the following topics:
|
1. General Information on FPOW Rating Activities
Introduction |
This topic contains general information on FPOW rating activities, including
|
Change Date |
August 16, 2024
|
VIII.iv.2.D.1.c. Responsibility for Selecting the FPOW Rating Activity |
Division managers or their designee must select all FPOW rating activity members.
Reference: For more information on rating activity leadership and their responsibilities, see M21-1, Part V, Subpart i, 1.A.1.c and d.
|
2. Deciding Claims Involving FPOWs
Introduction |
This topic contains information on deciding claims involving FPOWs, including
|
Change Date |
August 16, 2024
|
VIII.iv.2.D.2.a. Considering All Relevant Laws, Regulations, and Directives for FPOW Claims |
All claims filed by FPOWs must be adjudicated in accordance with all sections of the laws, regulations, and directives concerning such claims.
References: For more information on
|
VIII.iv.2.D.2.b. Liberal Application of Directives Per 38 CFR 3.304(e) in FPOW Claims |
In accordance with 38 CFR 3.304(e), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) employs a liberal approach when adjudicating claims for SC from FPOWs.
This policy is based on the following two important factors
|
VIII.iv.2.D.2.d. Considering the Adequacy of Medical Evidence in FPOW Claims |
Medical evidence that is current, accurate, and complete is paramount. Examine medical evidence thoroughly to determine whether it is adequate to evaluate the disabilities under consideration. Request a physical examination to supplement the evidence when necessary.
Ensure that a determination is not made on the basis of medical evidence that is not current or that is incomplete with regard to the disabilities under consideration.
Important: If the Veteran was not previously examined under an FPOW Protocol disability benefits questionnaire, request such an examination.
References: For more information on
|
VIII.iv.2.D.2.h. Requesting an Advisory Opinion in FPOW Claims |
If it is unclear whether a condition is a residual of the POW experience, request an advisory opinion as provided in advisory opinions, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart v, 1.A.
|
3. Presumption of SC for FPOWs
Introduction |
This topic contains information on presumptive SC for FPOWs, including
|
Change Date |
May 13, 2015
|
VIII.iv.2.D.3.a. Establishing Presumptive SC Under 38 CFR 3.309(c) |
The diseases specified in 38 CFR 3.309(c)(1) and (2) must be presumed to be service-connected (SC) if they become 10 percent or more disabling at any time after service and the Veteran has qualifying POW service.
References: For more information on
|
VIII.iv.2.D.3.b. Disabilities Presumed to be SC for FPOWs Under 38 CFR 3.309(c) |
The disabilities presumed to be SC for FPOWs can be found at 38 CFR 3.309(c).
Important:
Notes:
Reference: For more information on diseases and disabilities subject to a presumption of SC, see 38 U.S.C. 1112.
|
VIII.iv.2.D.3.c. Absence of Evidence in Service Records of Presumptive Disabilities in FPOW Claims |
Since the disabilities listed in 38 CFR 3.309(c) are presumed to be SC a record of their treatment or existence during service is not required.
Do not deny SC for one of these conditions predicated solely upon a deficiency in the Veteran’s STRs.
|
VIII.iv.2.D.3.e. Denying Presumptive SC for an FPOW Claim |
Before denying presumptive SC for an FPOW, at least one of the following two conclusions must be reached based on a thorough review of the evidence of record
|
4. Considering SC for Certain Disabilities of FPOWs
Introduction |
This topic contains information on considering SC for certain disabilities of FPOWs, including
|
Change Date |
August 16, 2024
|
VIII.iv.2.D.4.a. Considering SC for Residuals of Frostbite |
Internment as a POW in climatic conditions consistent with the occurrence of frostbite is a prerequisite to establishing SC on a presumptive basis for organic residuals of frostbite.
Notes:
Reference: For more information on rating residuals of cold injury, see M21-1, Part V, Subpart iii, 5.4.
|
VIII.iv.2.D.4.b. Considering SC for Peripheral Neuropathy |
Peripheral neuropathy is subject to a presumption of SC under 38 CFR 3.309(c), except when the evidence establishes that peripheral neuropathy is directly related to infectious causes which are unrelated to an FPOW’s detainment.
Notes:
|
VIII.iv.2.D.4.c. Distinguishing Between Post-Traumatic Arthritis and Degenerative Arthritis in an FPOW Claim |
If a Veteran of advanced age with multiple joint arthritis alleges trauma as the cause of arthritis at all or some of the disease sites, the rating activity must take care to distinguish between post-traumatic arthritis and degenerative or age-related arthritis when considering SC.
In such situations, obtain the most complete account possible of the traumatic incident. Information that should be available for consideration includes
Important: A reasonable basis for an award of SC might include
Note: A medical opinion from a physician qualified to conduct FPOW examinations may be necessary to determine whether a current diagnosis of arthritis is consistent with the traumatic injuries reported by the FPOW. The Former Prisoner of War (POW) Protocol Disability Benefits Questionnaire contains a specific instruction to elicit whether diagnosed osteoarthritis is post-traumatic, and if so whether it is related to the period of confinement.
Reference: For more information on FPOW protocol examinations, see M21-1, Part VIII, Subpart iv, 2.C.2.
|
VIII.iv.2.D.4.e. Considering SC for Osteoporosis – PTSD Diagnosed |
Effective October 10, 2008, a presumption of SC was established for osteoporosis under 38 CFR 3.309(c)(1) for FPOWs who
Note: PTSD is the only anxiety disorder recognized under 38 CFR 3.309(c)(1) as being associated with osteoporosis.
|
VIII.iv.2.D.4.f. Considering SC for Osteoporosis – PTSD Not Diagnosed |
Effective September 28, 2009, a presumption of SC was established for osteoporosis under 38 CFR 3.309(c)(2) for FPOWs who were detained or interned for 30 days or longer.
Note: This presumption is based, at least in part, on the likely nutritional deprivation experienced during longer (30 days or more) periods of captivity.
|
VIII.iv.2.D.4.g. FPOW Claims With Diagnoses of Both Osteoporosis and Arthritis |
Many FPOWs who claim SC for osteoporosis, evaluated under 38 CFR 4.71(a), diagnostic code (DC) 5013 based on joint manifestations, have already established SC for arthritis, which is also evaluated based on symptoms in skeletal joints.
If a claim involves diagnoses of both osteoporosis and arthritis, obtain a medical opinion as to the etiology of the symptoms affecting a particular joint or joints.
Notes:
|
5. Preparing a Rating Decision Involving a Presumption of SC
Introduction |
This topic contains information on preparing a rating decision involving a presumption of SC, including
|
Change Date |
August 16, 2024
|
VIII.iv.2.D.5.a. Information Required in the POW Rating Decision |
Rating decisions must contain a summary of all available information about the Veteran’s confinement as a POW, such as the
Reference: For more information on completing the rating decision narrative, see M21-1, Part V, Subpart iv, 1.A.
|
VIII.iv.2.D.5.d. Coding Specific FPOW Disabilities |
Use the information below to code specific FPOW disabilities.
|
6. History of Disabilities Subject to Presumptive SC for FPOWs
Introduction |
This topic contains information on the history of disabilities subject to presumptive SC for FPOWs, including the
|
Change Date |
May 13, 2015
|
VIII.iv.2.D.6.a. History Behind the Length of Confinement Requirement for FPOWs |
Effective December 16, 2003, Public Law (PL) 108-183 eliminated the length of confinement requirement of 30 days or longer for the following disabilities
For claims received from October 1, 1981, through December 15, 2003, an FPOW must have been confined for 30 days or longer to be eligible for a presumption of SC for any of the disabilities listed in 38 CFR 3.309(c).
For claims received before October 1, 1981, confinement of six months or longer was required.
Note: Certain disabilities are established under 38 CFR 3.309(c)(1) without regard to length of POW confinement.
Reference: For more information on length of confinement requirements, see M21-1, Part VIII, Subpart iv, 2.D.3.b and c.
|
VIII.iv.2.D.6.b. History of PLs and Federal Register Citations for FPOW Diseases |
The table below contains the history of the PLs and Federal Register citations that have authorized a presumption of SC for the disabilities listed in 38 CFR 3.309(c).
|